Algorithmic-Assisted Decision-Making Tools in Child Welfare Practice: A Systematic Review

Purpose: Algorithmic-assisted decision-making tools are increasingly used in child welfare services, yet key factors and challenges for successful and ethical implementation remain underexplored. This review centers on fairness, equity, and ethics in their application. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines and including gray literature, nine studies were reviewed that described algorithmic tools implementation across various stages of the child welfare system. The review focused on identifying challenges and critical success factors, especially concerning fairness, equity, and ethics. Results: This study used a holistic framework to review critical aspects from tool development to deployment. Additionally, strategies to address fairness and ethical considerations were identified and synthesized. Discussion and Applications to Practice: Algorithmic-assisted tools hold promise for supporting high-stakes decisions in child welfare, but responsible use requires attention to ethical implementation. The review reveals significant methodological and empirical gaps, underscoring the need for future research to ensure equitable and effective deployment in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Social Work Practice
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251350933
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic-Assisted Decision-Making Tools in Child Welfare Practice: A Systematic Review

Roderick A. Rose, Meng-Hsuan Yu
Research on Social Work Practice
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Algorithmic-Assisted Decision-Making Tools in Child Welfare Practice: A Systematic Review

Roderick A. Rose, Meng-Hsuan Yu
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Algorithmic-assisted decision-making tools are increasingly used in child welfare services, yet key factors and challenges for successful and ethical implementation remain underexplored. This review centers on fairness, equity, and ethics in their application. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines and including gray literature, nine studies were reviewed that described algorithmic tools implementation across various stages of the child welfare system. The review focused on identifying challenges and critical success factors, especially concerning fairness, equity, and ethics. Results: This study used a holistic framework to review critical aspects from tool development to deployment. Additionally, strategies to address fairness and ethical considerations were identified and synthesized. Discussion and Applications to Practice: Algorithmic-assisted tools hold promise for supporting high-stakes decisions in child welfare, but responsible use requires attention to ethical implementation. The review reveals significant methodological and empirical gaps, underscoring the need for future research to ensure equitable and effective deployment in practice.

Research on Social Work Practice
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Algorithmic-Assisted Decision-Making Tools in Child Welfare Practice: A Systematic Review — Roderick A. Rose, Meng-Hsuan Yu · Research on Social Work Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS