From twin transition to twice the burden? Digitalisation, energy demand, and economic growth

This paper evaluates the potential of digitalisation to drive structural transformations towards a sustainable economy. We apply an index decomposition analysis (IDA) to understand the factors influencing energy demand in a panel of 31 high-income countries (1971–2019). The IDA framework includes four factors related to the scale and sectoral composition of the economy and technical improvements, accounting for the quality of energy flows and actual work potential through useful exergy measures. We apply the model at the sector level across 16 productive industries to explore cross-sector heterogeneity in energy demand, and then compare results across digitial intensity categories. We find that value added growth is the primary driver of energy use. While digitalisation alone does not fully explain trends in energy demand, it is strongly associated with value added growth in high digital intensity sectors and amplifies the use of energy. Left ungoverned, digitalisation risks intensifying economic–ecological tensions, but if steered towards socio-ecological priorities—while addressing the environmental costs of growth—it holds potential to deliver real benefits. We discuss these findings in the context of recent policy actions promoting the “twin” green and digital transition. • Economic factors outweigh technical factors in driving changes in energy demand. • High digitalisation amplifies sectoral growth and raises energy demand. • Efficiency alone is not enough; demand cuts and rebound mitigation strategies are needed. • Greener technological trajectories require addressing economic–ecological tensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108747
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From twin transition to twice the burden? Digitalisation, energy demand, and economic growth

Zeke Marshall, Paul E. Brockway, Emmanuel Aramendia, Matthew Kuperus Heun et al.
1 citations
Ecological Economics
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
article

From twin transition to twice the burden? Digitalisation, energy demand, and economic growth

Zeke Marshall, Paul E. Brockway, Emmanuel Aramendia, Matthew Kuperus Heun, Stefano Bianchini, Jérôme Hambye-Verbrugghen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper evaluates the potential of digitalisation to drive structural transformations towards a sustainable economy. We apply an index decomposition analysis (IDA) to understand the factors influencing energy demand in a panel of 31 high-income countries (1971–2019). The IDA framework includes four factors related to the scale and sectoral composition of the economy and technical improvements, accounting for the quality of energy flows and actual work potential through useful exergy measures. We apply the model at the sector level across 16 productive industries to explore cross-sector heterogeneity in energy demand, and then compare results across digitial intensity categories. We find that value added growth is the primary driver of energy use. While digitalisation alone does not fully explain trends in energy demand, it is strongly associated with value added growth in high digital intensity sectors and amplifies the use of energy. Left ungoverned, digitalisation risks intensifying economic–ecological tensions, but if steered towards socio-ecological priorities—while addressing the environmental costs of growth—it holds potential to deliver real benefits. We discuss these findings in the context of recent policy actions promoting the “twin” green and digital transition. • Economic factors outweigh technical factors in driving changes in energy demand. • High digitalisation amplifies sectoral growth and raises energy demand. • Efficiency alone is not enough; demand cuts and rebound mitigation strategies are needed. • Greener technological trajectories require addressing economic–ecological tensions.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 239
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Calvin University (KR), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.