Automated Literature Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Through Integration of 3 Large Language Models: Methodological Study (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Primary liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), poses significant clinical challenges due to late-stage diagnosis, tumor heterogeneity, and rapidly evolving therapeutic strategies. While systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential for updating clinical guidelines, their labor-intensive nature limits timely evidence synthesis. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study proposes an automated literature screening workflow powered by large language models (LLMs) to accelerate evidence synthesis for HCC treatment guidelines. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We developed a tripartite LLM framework integrating Doubao-1.5-pro-32k, Deepseek-v3, and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B to simulate collaborative decision-making for study inclusion and exclusion. The system was evaluated across 9 reconstructed datasets derived from published HCC meta-analyses, with performance assessed using accuracy, agreement metrics (κ and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted κ), recall, precision, &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-scores, and computational efficiency parameters (processing time and cost). </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The framework demonstrated good performance, with a weighted accuracy of 0.96 and substantial agreement (prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted κ=0.91), achieving high weighted recall (0.90) but modest weighted precision (0.15) and &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-scores (0.22). Computational efficiency varied across datasets (processing time: 248-5850 s; cost: US $0.14-$3.68 per dataset). </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> This LLM-driven approach shows promise for accelerating evidence synthesis in HCC care by reducing screening time while maintaining methodological rigor. Key limitations related to clinical context sensitivity and error propagation highlight the need for reinforcement learning integration and domain-specific fine-tuning. LLM agent architectures with reinforcement learning offer a practical path for streamlining guideline updates, though further optimization is needed to improve specialization and reliability in complex clinical settings. </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.76252
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Literature Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Through Integration of 3 Large Language Models: Methodological Study (Preprint)

Gang Zhang, Zhiming Yang, Chen Pan, Jingcheng Hao et al.
Topic Modeling
article

Automated Literature Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Through Integration of 3 Large Language Models: Methodological Study (Preprint)

Gang Zhang, Zhiming Yang, Chen Pan, Jingcheng Hao, Wei Lü, B Chen
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Primary liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), poses significant clinical challenges due to late-stage diagnosis, tumor heterogeneity, and rapidly evolving therapeutic strategies. While systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential for updating clinical guidelines, their labor-intensive nature limits timely evidence synthesis. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study proposes an automated literature screening workflow powered by large language models (LLMs) to accelerate evidence synthesis for HCC treatment guidelines. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We developed a tripartite LLM framework integrating Doubao-1.5-pro-32k, Deepseek-v3, and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B to simulate collaborative decision-making for study inclusion and exclusion. The system was evaluated across 9 reconstructed datasets derived from published HCC meta-analyses, with performance assessed using accuracy, agreement metrics (κ and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted κ), recall, precision, &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-scores, and computational efficiency parameters (processing time and cost). </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The framework demonstrated good performance, with a weighted accuracy of 0.96 and substantial agreement (prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted κ=0.91), achieving high weighted recall (0.90) but modest weighted precision (0.15) and &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-scores (0.22). Computational efficiency varied across datasets (processing time: 248-5850 s; cost: US $0.14-$3.68 per dataset). </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> This LLM-driven approach shows promise for accelerating evidence synthesis in HCC care by reducing screening time while maintaining methodological rigor. Key limitations related to clinical context sensitivity and error propagation highlight the need for reinforcement learning integration and domain-specific fine-tuning. LLM agent architectures with reinforcement learning offer a practical path for streamlining guideline updates, though further optimization is needed to improve specialization and reliability in complex clinical settings. </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.