Perception of frequency-dependent processing delays motivated by hearing devices

Processing delays can negatively affect listening experience, especially in cases where the (processed) delayed sound interferes with an un-delayed (or direct) sound component, as it is the case for (open-fit) hearing devices. In this study, psychometric functions for delay perception in individual frequency bands were measured. Also, it was assessed how noticeability adds up across frequency bands for frequency-dependent processing delays. Noticeability of delays depends largely on the phase shift they introduce in each frequency band. Psychometric functions are non-monotonous, with maximum noticeability at phase shifts (2n+1)π. When using the sensitivity index d' to describe the noticeability of a delay, the overall noticeability dtotal' of a frequency-dependent delay was found to be the RMS of the noticeabilities dn' in each frequency band n. Additionally, different auditory models were tested regarding their capability to predict the experimental results. The audio quality model GPSMq [Biberger et al. (2018). J. Audio Eng. Soc. 66(7), 578-593] showed the best performance for the majority of conditions, yielding predictions that are highly correlated (ρ>0.85) with the participants' results. Model performance could confirm that delays are mainly perceived based on spectral effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0039059
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception of frequency-dependent processing delays motivated by hearing devices

Thomas Biberger, Birger Kollmeier, Kristin Ohlmann
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Perception of frequency-dependent processing delays motivated by hearing devices

Thomas Biberger, Birger Kollmeier, Kristin Ohlmann
article en

Abstract

Processing delays can negatively affect listening experience, especially in cases where the (processed) delayed sound interferes with an un-delayed (or direct) sound component, as it is the case for (open-fit) hearing devices. In this study, psychometric functions for delay perception in individual frequency bands were measured. Also, it was assessed how noticeability adds up across frequency bands for frequency-dependent processing delays. Noticeability of delays depends largely on the phase shift they introduce in each frequency band. Psychometric functions are non-monotonous, with maximum noticeability at phase shifts (2n+1)π. When using the sensitivity index d' to describe the noticeability of a delay, the overall noticeability dtotal' of a frequency-dependent delay was found to be the RMS of the noticeabilities dn' in each frequency band n. Additionally, different auditory models were tested regarding their capability to predict the experimental results. The audio quality model GPSMq [Biberger et al. (2018). J. Audio Eng. Soc. 66(7), 578-593] showed the best performance for the majority of conditions, yielding predictions that are highly correlated (ρ>0.85) with the participants' results. Model performance could confirm that delays are mainly perceived based on spectral effects.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 158(3)
Hearing4all (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perception of frequency-dependent processing delays motivated by hearing devices — Thomas Biberger, Birger Kollmeier, et al. · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS