Dinamika Pesantren Modern dan Salafi dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Pendidikan Islam

Pesantren are the oldest Islamic educational institutions in Indonesia, broadly categorized into two main models: salafi and modern pesantren. Each features distinct curriculum systems, educational philosophies, and responses to national education policies. This study aims to compare the dynamics of these two pesantren models within the framework of Islamic education policy in Indonesia. Employing a descriptive-qualitative approach through literature and policy analysis, this article critically examines their similarities and differences. The findings indicate that salafi pesantren excel in preserving classical Islamic scholarship and instilling strong religious values, yet are less responsive to the demands of the national education system. In contrast, modern pesantren are more adaptive to the national curriculum and contemporary needs, though they risk losing their traditional pesantren identity. Both face challenges in systemically integrating with existing national education policies. Therefore, this article recommends the development of a more integrative and contextual Islamic education policy model that accommodates the unique characteristics of both pesantren types within the national education framework. The study contributes to shaping a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable reform of Islamic education in Indonesia. Keywords: salafi pesantren, modern pesantren, Islamic education policy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
An-Nahdloh Journal of Education and Islamic Studies
Published
2025-07-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58788/jeis.v1i1.5
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dinamika Pesantren Modern dan Salafi dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Pendidikan Islam

Lukman Asha, Jumira Warlizasusi, Fakhruddin Fakhruddin, Riyan Riyan et al.
An-Nahdloh Journal of Education and Islamic Studies
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Dinamika Pesantren Modern dan Salafi dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Pendidikan Islam

Lukman Asha, Jumira Warlizasusi, Fakhruddin Fakhruddin, Riyan Riyan, Sujirman Sujirman, Wahyudi Putra
article en

Abstract

Pesantren are the oldest Islamic educational institutions in Indonesia, broadly categorized into two main models: salafi and modern pesantren. Each features distinct curriculum systems, educational philosophies, and responses to national education policies. This study aims to compare the dynamics of these two pesantren models within the framework of Islamic education policy in Indonesia. Employing a descriptive-qualitative approach through literature and policy analysis, this article critically examines their similarities and differences. The findings indicate that salafi pesantren excel in preserving classical Islamic scholarship and instilling strong religious values, yet are less responsive to the demands of the national education system. In contrast, modern pesantren are more adaptive to the national curriculum and contemporary needs, though they risk losing their traditional pesantren identity. Both face challenges in systemically integrating with existing national education policies. Therefore, this article recommends the development of a more integrative and contextual Islamic education policy model that accommodates the unique characteristics of both pesantren types within the national education framework. The study contributes to shaping a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable reform of Islamic education in Indonesia. Keywords: salafi pesantren, modern pesantren, Islamic education policy

An-Nahdloh Journal of Education and Islamic StudiesVol. 1(1)
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu (ID), Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.