P28-08 Evaluating the potential of ReproTracker as an alternative assay for regulatory use following the ICH S5 (R3) guideline

ICH S5 (3R) is paving the way for the acceptance and validation of alternative models for developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) testing by establishing the requirements and promoting regulatory confidence in new approach methodologies. In vitro models, validated based on regulatory guidelines, can be used as powerful tools within weight-of-evidence approaches in multiple frameworks for DART testing. The ReproTracker assay is based on human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) which are differentiated towards three germ layer-specific cell types: cardiomyocytes (mesoderm), hepatocytes (endoderm), and neural rosettes (ectoderm). This model enables the assessment of the teratogenic potential by tracking alterations in biomarker expression, as well as morphological disruptions in the differentiated cells upon compound exposure. To comprehensively validate the assay, we tested the 32 compounds listed in the ICH S5 (3R) guidelines. Following identification of human developmental toxicants in ReproTracker, we assessed the clinical relevance of the concentrations detected as potentially teratogenic by investigating their correlation with their corresponding human therapeutic Cmax. In this study, the ReproTracker assay was able to correctly classify 26 of the 29 positive reference compounds, indicating the potential of the assay for DART testing. Two of the missed compounds were identified as DNA modifying agents, namely 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate. These compounds exhibited highly cytotoxicy profiles leading to very low top concentrations (less than 1 and 0.01 µM, respectively) being tested in the assay. For the majority of compounds, the assay predicted teratogenicity at concentrations either below or similar to the clinically relevant concentrations (human Cmax). When the predicted lowest adverse effect levels were higher than the respective Cmax, they did not exceed a 10–40 fold difference. While two of the three negative controls were correctly classified as negatives, vildagliptin was falsely classified as a teratogen but at concentrations more than 400-fold higher than its human relevant concentration (0.3 µM). In this study, the ReproTracker assay demonstrated a high predictability 96% with a sensitivity of 90%, highligting the potential of the assay in teratogenicity assessment. This study showcases the predicitive potential of ReproTracker to detect teratogenicity of chemicals and positions the assay at the forefront of in vitro DART testing. Moreover, validation following the ICH S5 guidelines provides a solid foundation for further validation and integration of the assay into safety assessment frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicology Letters
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.07.813
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P28-08 Evaluating the potential of ReproTracker as an alternative assay for regulatory use following the ICH S5 (R3) guideline

Gang Zhang, A. Jamalpoor, G. Hendriks, Tom Zwetsloot et al.
Toxicology Letters
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

P28-08 Evaluating the potential of ReproTracker as an alternative assay for regulatory use following the ICH S5 (R3) guideline

Gang Zhang, A. Jamalpoor, G. Hendriks, Tom Zwetsloot, Eric W.‐F. Lam, S. Hartvelt, Jing Fang, P.E. van Rossum, J. Horcas-Nieto, Connor Philippo
article en

Abstract

ICH S5 (3R) is paving the way for the acceptance and validation of alternative models for developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) testing by establishing the requirements and promoting regulatory confidence in new approach methodologies. In vitro models, validated based on regulatory guidelines, can be used as powerful tools within weight-of-evidence approaches in multiple frameworks for DART testing. The ReproTracker assay is based on human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) which are differentiated towards three germ layer-specific cell types: cardiomyocytes (mesoderm), hepatocytes (endoderm), and neural rosettes (ectoderm). This model enables the assessment of the teratogenic potential by tracking alterations in biomarker expression, as well as morphological disruptions in the differentiated cells upon compound exposure. To comprehensively validate the assay, we tested the 32 compounds listed in the ICH S5 (3R) guidelines. Following identification of human developmental toxicants in ReproTracker, we assessed the clinical relevance of the concentrations detected as potentially teratogenic by investigating their correlation with their corresponding human therapeutic Cmax. In this study, the ReproTracker assay was able to correctly classify 26 of the 29 positive reference compounds, indicating the potential of the assay for DART testing. Two of the missed compounds were identified as DNA modifying agents, namely 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate. These compounds exhibited highly cytotoxicy profiles leading to very low top concentrations (less than 1 and 0.01 µM, respectively) being tested in the assay. For the majority of compounds, the assay predicted teratogenicity at concentrations either below or similar to the clinically relevant concentrations (human Cmax). When the predicted lowest adverse effect levels were higher than the respective Cmax, they did not exceed a 10–40 fold difference. While two of the three negative controls were correctly classified as negatives, vildagliptin was falsely classified as a teratogen but at concentrations more than 400-fold higher than its human relevant concentration (0.3 µM). In this study, the ReproTracker assay demonstrated a high predictability 96% with a sensitivity of 90%, highligting the potential of the assay in teratogenicity assessment. This study showcases the predicitive potential of ReproTracker to detect teratogenicity of chemicals and positions the assay at the forefront of in vitro DART testing. Moreover, validation following the ICH S5 guidelines provides a solid foundation for further validation and integration of the assay into safety assessment frameworks.

Toxicology LettersVol. 411
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.