P22-20 Evaluating the pulmonary toxicity of nanocellulose as a promising alternative to plastic

With growing concern over plastic pollution, biodegradable polymers have gained attention as sustainable alternatives. Among them, nanocellulose – cellulose fibers with at least one dimension under 100 nm – has emerged as a strong candidate to replace conventional plastics due to its biodegradability, renewability, and ease of chemical modification. However, its nanoscale size raises concerns about potential health risks, particularly through inhalation, which has not been thoroughly studied. In this study, we assessed the respiratory toxicity of five types of nanocellulose derived from different raw materials and processing methods. We conducted both in vitro experiments using lung epithelial and macrophage cell lines, and in vivo studies through intratracheal instillation in mice. The in vitro results showed no evidence of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, or inflammatory responses. In contrast, in vivo exposure led to noticeable inflammatory cell infiltration and histopathological changes in lung tissues. Notably, microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) produced from hardwood kraft pulp via high-pressure homogenization significantly increased eosinophil infiltration in mouse lungs. This response suggests a potential to trigger allergic reactions associated with asthma. While a full risk assessment requires accurate data on human inhalation exposure levels, our findings indicate that, despite its promise as a sustainable plastic alternative, this study suggests that nanocellulose may pose respiratory health risks under certain conditions. Funding: This research was supported by the Korea Planning & Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) through the Project for technology development and corporate support for nanoproduct performance safety evaluation, funded by the Korea Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (RS-2024-00466969) and the Korea Institute of Toxicology (grant no. TS-2501).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicology Letters
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.07.649
Primary Topic
Polymer Foaming and Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P22-20 Evaluating the pulmonary toxicity of nanocellulose as a promising alternative to plastic

Min‐Ae Song, K. Lee, Jiyoung Kim
Toxicology Letters
Polymer Foaming and Composites
article

P22-20 Evaluating the pulmonary toxicity of nanocellulose as a promising alternative to plastic

Min‐Ae Song, K. Lee, Jiyoung Kim
article en

Abstract

With growing concern over plastic pollution, biodegradable polymers have gained attention as sustainable alternatives. Among them, nanocellulose – cellulose fibers with at least one dimension under 100 nm – has emerged as a strong candidate to replace conventional plastics due to its biodegradability, renewability, and ease of chemical modification. However, its nanoscale size raises concerns about potential health risks, particularly through inhalation, which has not been thoroughly studied. In this study, we assessed the respiratory toxicity of five types of nanocellulose derived from different raw materials and processing methods. We conducted both in vitro experiments using lung epithelial and macrophage cell lines, and in vivo studies through intratracheal instillation in mice. The in vitro results showed no evidence of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, or inflammatory responses. In contrast, in vivo exposure led to noticeable inflammatory cell infiltration and histopathological changes in lung tissues. Notably, microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) produced from hardwood kraft pulp via high-pressure homogenization significantly increased eosinophil infiltration in mouse lungs. This response suggests a potential to trigger allergic reactions associated with asthma. While a full risk assessment requires accurate data on human inhalation exposure levels, our findings indicate that, despite its promise as a sustainable plastic alternative, this study suggests that nanocellulose may pose respiratory health risks under certain conditions. Funding: This research was supported by the Korea Planning & Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) through the Project for technology development and corporate support for nanoproduct performance safety evaluation, funded by the Korea Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (RS-2024-00466969) and the Korea Institute of Toxicology (grant no. TS-2501).

Toxicology LettersVol. 411
Korea Institute of Toxicology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Polymer Foaming and Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

P22-20 Evaluating the pulmonary toxicity of nanocellulose as a promising alternative to plastic — Min‐Ae Song, K. Lee, et al. · Toxicology Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS