Study on the Perceptions and Experiences of Generative AI Among Students at G University

This study surveyed 175 students enrolled at G University, located in Gimcheon, Gyeongsangbuk-do, to examine their perceptions and experiences regarding generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI). Data collected through an online questionnaire were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. The results showed that 75.4% of respondents had experience using AI, with the primary purposes being academic support and information retrieval. All satisfaction factors—including convenience, usefulness, interest, and reliability—along with educational effectiveness (M = 3.51) and the perceived necessity of education (M = 3.65) were above the median. Most students used AI for idea generation or drafting, while 7.5% submitted outputs exactly as generated. However, the absence of institutional usage guidelines (67.4%) and literacy gaps were identified as potential issues. Based on these findings, it is recommended that universities develop ethical guidelines, implement phased AI literacy education, and design assignments that promote creativity and critical thinking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education Welfare
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20496/cpew.2025.12.4.171
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Perceptions and Experiences of Generative AI Among Students at G University

Keel-Duck JANG, K. Kim
The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education Welfare
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
article

Study on the Perceptions and Experiences of Generative AI Among Students at G University

Keel-Duck JANG, K. Kim
article en

Abstract

This study surveyed 175 students enrolled at G University, located in Gimcheon, Gyeongsangbuk-do, to examine their perceptions and experiences regarding generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI). Data collected through an online questionnaire were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. The results showed that 75.4% of respondents had experience using AI, with the primary purposes being academic support and information retrieval. All satisfaction factors—including convenience, usefulness, interest, and reliability—along with educational effectiveness (M = 3.51) and the perceived necessity of education (M = 3.65) were above the median. Most students used AI for idea generation or drafting, while 7.5% submitted outputs exactly as generated. However, the absence of institutional usage guidelines (67.4%) and literacy gaps were identified as potential issues. Based on these findings, it is recommended that universities develop ethical guidelines, implement phased AI literacy education, and design assignments that promote creativity and critical thinking.

The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education WelfareVol. 12(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.