A Systematic Review of Estimated Signs, Symptoms, and Risks Associated With Vaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy: The Integration of A Traditional Approach and Personalized Self-assessment Questionnaire

Background: This review aimed to implement a search strategy focused on vaginal candida infections in pregnant women and to analyze specific vulvovaginal symptom questionnaires (VSQs) for Candida infections. Methods: A literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 1997 and 2023. The search strategy included keywords related to vaginal candidiasis, pregnancy, risk factors, symptoms, and self-assessment VSQs. The studies were assessed for quality using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools, focusing on validity, reliability, and appropriate statistical methods. Results: A total of 36 papers with vaginal candidiasis reported during pregnancy were included (1997–2023), along with 14 papers reporting the use of VSQs. The literature was found to lack sufficient data, with a wide variation in population size and data across studies. Sample sizes ranged from as few as 80 patients to as many as 13,863 patients in other studies. Notably, a significant age range was observed among the participants, spanning from 10 to 64 years. Additionally, symptoms and signs were not investigated in 17 studies, while risk factors were not discussed in 20 studies. A total of 14 studies were identified; however, only one was presented with a fully developed VSQ, which had been validated and was available in multiple languages. Meanwhile, none of the studies focused on pregnant women and the role of VSQs. Conclusions: Incorporating self-assessment VSQs into clinical practice would improve everyday practice and increase awareness among pregnant women regarding vulvovaginal Candida infections, improve the identification and management of these infections, leading to earlier detection, more timely treatment, and improved health outcomes for newborns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/ceog37738
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review of Estimated Signs, Symptoms, and Risks Associated With Vaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy: The Integration of A Traditional Approach and Personalized Self-assessment Questionnaire

Ljubomir Petričević, A. Jurisic, Vladimir Gerginic, Valentina Arsić‐Arsenijević et al.
1 citations
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Reproductive tract infections research
1.18
article

A Systematic Review of Estimated Signs, Symptoms, and Risks Associated With Vaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy: The Integration of A Traditional Approach and Personalized Self-assessment Questionnaire

Ljubomir Petričević, A. Jurisic, Vladimir Gerginic, Valentina Arsić‐Arsenijević, Biljana Miličić, Bojana Šalović, Nadezda Djuricic
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: This review aimed to implement a search strategy focused on vaginal candida infections in pregnant women and to analyze specific vulvovaginal symptom questionnaires (VSQs) for Candida infections. Methods: A literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 1997 and 2023. The search strategy included keywords related to vaginal candidiasis, pregnancy, risk factors, symptoms, and self-assessment VSQs. The studies were assessed for quality using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools, focusing on validity, reliability, and appropriate statistical methods. Results: A total of 36 papers with vaginal candidiasis reported during pregnancy were included (1997–2023), along with 14 papers reporting the use of VSQs. The literature was found to lack sufficient data, with a wide variation in population size and data across studies. Sample sizes ranged from as few as 80 patients to as many as 13,863 patients in other studies. Notably, a significant age range was observed among the participants, spanning from 10 to 64 years. Additionally, symptoms and signs were not investigated in 17 studies, while risk factors were not discussed in 20 studies. A total of 14 studies were identified; however, only one was presented with a fully developed VSQ, which had been validated and was available in multiple languages. Meanwhile, none of the studies focused on pregnant women and the role of VSQs. Conclusions: Incorporating self-assessment VSQs into clinical practice would improve everyday practice and increase awareness among pregnant women regarding vulvovaginal Candida infections, improve the identification and management of these infections, leading to earlier detection, more timely treatment, and improved health outcomes for newborns.

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologyVol. 52(8)
University of Belgrade (RS), Center for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences (RS), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Reproductive tract infections research
1.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.