Quality and content analysis of hip arthroscopy videos on YouTube™

Aims: We have planned a study aimed at analyzing the content and quality of videos related to hip arthroscopy on YouTube. YouTube™ is indeed one of the most popular platforms for video content on the Internet, offering a vast array of videos on various topics ranging from entertainment to educational resources. The platform hosts a substantial amount of orthopedic video content that is not subject to any screening or editorial review process. The quality of videos on hip arthroscopy has not been assessed before. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and comprehensiveness of YouTube™ videos on the topic of hip arthroscopy. Methods: The videos were evaluated by one orthopedic surgeon using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, the DISCERN tool for consumer health information quality and the Global Quality Score (GQS). This evaluation aimed to determine the accuracy of these assessment methods. Results: Among the first 50 videos evaluated, 20 (40%) were uploaded by doctors, 10 (20%) by physiotherapists, 8 (16%) by individual patients sharing their experiences, 3 (6%) by clinics, 4 (8%) by health channels, and 5 (10%) by hospitals. The average number of views was 1.150 (range: 1-18.553), the average video length was 12 minutes and 10 seconds (range: 24 seconds to 1 hour and 10 minutes), the average number of likes was 102.46 (range: 1-3,546), and the average number of dislikes was 8 (range: 0-98). The average DISCERN score was 32.46 (range: 14-68), the average VPI was 40.36 (range: 0-460), the average GQS was 2.24 (range: 1-4), and the average JAMA score was 2.41 (range: 1-3). Conclusion: The quality of information about hip arthroscopy on YouTube is generally low and offers limited educational value. Therefore, healthcare providers should caution their patients about relying on these sources and provide more reliable educational alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1722727
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality and content analysis of hip arthroscopy videos on YouTube™

Mesut Karıksız, Okan Ateş
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Quality and content analysis of hip arthroscopy videos on YouTube™

Mesut Karıksız, Okan Ateş
article en

Abstract

Aims: We have planned a study aimed at analyzing the content and quality of videos related to hip arthroscopy on YouTube. YouTube™ is indeed one of the most popular platforms for video content on the Internet, offering a vast array of videos on various topics ranging from entertainment to educational resources. The platform hosts a substantial amount of orthopedic video content that is not subject to any screening or editorial review process. The quality of videos on hip arthroscopy has not been assessed before. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and comprehensiveness of YouTube™ videos on the topic of hip arthroscopy. Methods: The videos were evaluated by one orthopedic surgeon using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, the DISCERN tool for consumer health information quality and the Global Quality Score (GQS). This evaluation aimed to determine the accuracy of these assessment methods. Results: Among the first 50 videos evaluated, 20 (40%) were uploaded by doctors, 10 (20%) by physiotherapists, 8 (16%) by individual patients sharing their experiences, 3 (6%) by clinics, 4 (8%) by health channels, and 5 (10%) by hospitals. The average number of views was 1.150 (range: 1-18.553), the average video length was 12 minutes and 10 seconds (range: 24 seconds to 1 hour and 10 minutes), the average number of likes was 102.46 (range: 1-3,546), and the average number of dislikes was 8 (range: 0-98). The average DISCERN score was 32.46 (range: 14-68), the average VPI was 40.36 (range: 0-460), the average GQS was 2.24 (range: 1-4), and the average JAMA score was 2.41 (range: 1-3). Conclusion: The quality of information about hip arthroscopy on YouTube is generally low and offers limited educational value. Therefore, healthcare providers should caution their patients about relying on these sources and provide more reliable educational alternatives.

Journal of Medicine and Palliative CareVol. 6(4)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.