A prospective randomized study comparing vaginal dinoprostone plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervix

Aims: To compare the effectiveness and outcomes of two medications (oxytocin and dinoprostone) used for cervical ripening and labor induction. Methods: Term nulliparous pregnant women with Bishop score <4 who received labor induction indication were divided into two groups. The first group received vaginal dinoprostone followed by oxytocin. The second group received only oxytocin only. Labor onset times, delivery duration, Bishop scores, contraction frequencies every 10 minutes, cesarean rates, and Apgar scores of newborns were compared between the two groups. Results: Although there was no statistically significant difference in terms of active labor onset time between the dinoprostone and oxytocin groups, a significant difference was observed regarding the time to delivery. (dinoprostone: 873.5±219.12 minutes; oxytocin: 637.4±339.3 minutes; p=0.0001). A significant difference was also found between the two groups in terms of mean Bishop scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours. (p=0.0001, p=0.0001, p=0.008, p=0.033, respectively). Similarly, there was a significant difference between the two groups regarding contraction frequency per 10 minutes in the first 2 hours of induction. (dinoprostone: 0.22±0.42/10 minutes; oxytocin: 0.72±0.88/10 minutes; p=0.0001) No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of cesarean rates. However, it was determined that the oxytocin group had a 2.06 times higher probability of undergoing cesarean section compared to the other group. OR:2.06 (0.83-5.10, 95% CI). The mean 1st minute Apgar score of babies in the dinoprostone group was 6.49±0.19 and the 5th minute Apgar score mean was 9.10±0.11. The mean 1st minute Apgar score of babies in the oxytocin group was 6.80±0.17 and the 5th minute Apgar score mean was 8.80±0.15, with no statistical significance detected between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Dinoprostone can be preferred as a method to reduce cesarean rates; however, oxytocin may be preferred in clinics with high patient density due to its faster effect and quicker completion of delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1742799
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective randomized study comparing vaginal dinoprostone plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervix

Naile İnci Davas, Eser Ağar
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

A prospective randomized study comparing vaginal dinoprostone plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervix

Naile İnci Davas, Eser Ağar
article en

Abstract

Aims: To compare the effectiveness and outcomes of two medications (oxytocin and dinoprostone) used for cervical ripening and labor induction. Methods: Term nulliparous pregnant women with Bishop score <4 who received labor induction indication were divided into two groups. The first group received vaginal dinoprostone followed by oxytocin. The second group received only oxytocin only. Labor onset times, delivery duration, Bishop scores, contraction frequencies every 10 minutes, cesarean rates, and Apgar scores of newborns were compared between the two groups. Results: Although there was no statistically significant difference in terms of active labor onset time between the dinoprostone and oxytocin groups, a significant difference was observed regarding the time to delivery. (dinoprostone: 873.5±219.12 minutes; oxytocin: 637.4±339.3 minutes; p=0.0001). A significant difference was also found between the two groups in terms of mean Bishop scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours. (p=0.0001, p=0.0001, p=0.008, p=0.033, respectively). Similarly, there was a significant difference between the two groups regarding contraction frequency per 10 minutes in the first 2 hours of induction. (dinoprostone: 0.22±0.42/10 minutes; oxytocin: 0.72±0.88/10 minutes; p=0.0001) No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of cesarean rates. However, it was determined that the oxytocin group had a 2.06 times higher probability of undergoing cesarean section compared to the other group. OR:2.06 (0.83-5.10, 95% CI). The mean 1st minute Apgar score of babies in the dinoprostone group was 6.49±0.19 and the 5th minute Apgar score mean was 9.10±0.11. The mean 1st minute Apgar score of babies in the oxytocin group was 6.80±0.17 and the 5th minute Apgar score mean was 8.80±0.15, with no statistical significance detected between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Dinoprostone can be preferred as a method to reduce cesarean rates; however, oxytocin may be preferred in clinics with high patient density due to its faster effect and quicker completion of delivery.

Journal of Medicine and Palliative CareVol. 6(4)
İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.