Current Trends and Future Directions of Statistical Methods in Medical Research: A Scientometric Analysis

Future research will likely focus on overcoming challenges related to data privacy, ethical considerations, and the need for continued biostatistics education in healthcare. This study offers a roadmap for ongoing research and highlights opportunities for future interdisciplinary collaborations to address the complexities of modern medical data analysis. This scientometrics study reveals the evolution of statistical methods used in medical research over time, evaluates frequently cited models and thematic changes, and provides implications that can enhance evidence-based decision-making processes regarding methodological choices that guide contemporary clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70257
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Trends and Future Directions of Statistical Methods in Medical Research: A Scientometric Analysis

Çağdaş Hakan Aladağ, Özkan Köse, Chaomei Chen, Fatma Yardibi
1 citations
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.40
article

Current Trends and Future Directions of Statistical Methods in Medical Research: A Scientometric Analysis

Çağdaş Hakan Aladağ, Özkan Köse, Chaomei Chen, Fatma Yardibi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Future research will likely focus on overcoming challenges related to data privacy, ethical considerations, and the need for continued biostatistics education in healthcare. This study offers a roadmap for ongoing research and highlights opportunities for future interdisciplinary collaborations to address the complexities of modern medical data analysis. This scientometrics study reveals the evolution of statistical methods used in medical research over time, evaluates frequently cited models and thematic changes, and provides implications that can enhance evidence-based decision-making processes regarding methodological choices that guide contemporary clinical practice.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 31(6)
University of Toronto (CA), Akdeniz University (TR), Antalya Bilim University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Hacettepe University (TR), Drexel University (US), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.