Value theory in the country and the city

This special issue on ‘Value Theory in the Country and the City’ sets out to further a conversation about value and to do so by accepting the view that there are multiple ‘lives’ of value, which include Marx’s theory of capital as well as extending beyond it. Pragmatically, this issue is timely. Discussion of value in relation to the centrality of ground rent to uneven development, agrarian reform of the rural and resource extraction has become more important in recent times. Equally, debates on value in relation to the city – be it housing values, property values, land values, environmental values or value capture – are burgeoning across academic and public debate throughout the world. Our focus on value theory in the country and the city is attuned to this diversity and the multiple meanings of value, in contrast to more monochrome views that seek to impose a singular and closed Marxism. Bubbling away, then, in current debates on value theory in the country and the city across political economy, development and geographical studies is a rejuvenation of understandings of value, as well as a focus on the politics of competing value claims. This special issue poses anew, in a form of co-questioning, such debates on value theory that can then be picked up and contemplated in future dialogue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning F
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825251368664
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value theory in the country and the city

Adam David Morton, Cameron McAuliffe, Dallas Rogers
Environment and Planning F
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Value theory in the country and the city

Adam David Morton, Cameron McAuliffe, Dallas Rogers
article en

Abstract

This special issue on ‘Value Theory in the Country and the City’ sets out to further a conversation about value and to do so by accepting the view that there are multiple ‘lives’ of value, which include Marx’s theory of capital as well as extending beyond it. Pragmatically, this issue is timely. Discussion of value in relation to the centrality of ground rent to uneven development, agrarian reform of the rural and resource extraction has become more important in recent times. Equally, debates on value in relation to the city – be it housing values, property values, land values, environmental values or value capture – are burgeoning across academic and public debate throughout the world. Our focus on value theory in the country and the city is attuned to this diversity and the multiple meanings of value, in contrast to more monochrome views that seek to impose a singular and closed Marxism. Bubbling away, then, in current debates on value theory in the country and the city across political economy, development and geographical studies is a rejuvenation of understandings of value, as well as a focus on the politics of competing value claims. This special issue poses anew, in a form of co-questioning, such debates on value theory that can then be picked up and contemplated in future dialogue.

Environment and Planning FVol. 4(3)
The University of Sydney (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Value theory in the country and the city — Adam David Morton, Cameron McAuliffe, et al. · Environment and Planning F (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS