A discounting framework for trade‐offs between risk and delay

Every day we encounter situations in which decisions require trade-offs between the delay to one reward and the likelihood of receiving another reward. The current study was designed to extend a general discounting framework to gain insights into this fundamental trade-off process. Forty-three undergraduates adjusted the probability of receiving an immediate hypothetical monetary reward (either $200 or $10,000) until that probabilistic reward was judged subjectively equal in value to the same reward received with certainty after a delay (ranging from 1 month to 25 years). We replicated previous findings that demonstrated a linear relation between log(delay) and log(odds-against), derived from the subjective probabilistic values. This linear relation was predicted when these choices were analyzed with the hyperboloid functions that describe simple delay and probability discounting in human decision making. Additionally, we extended the discounting framework and showed that the trade-off between risk and delay was well described by a modified hyperboloid discounting model (R<sup>2</sup>s = .99). These findings suggest that the discounting framework provides a valuable approach for capturing complexities of human decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.70052
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A discounting framework for trade‐offs between risk and delay

Yu‐Hua Yeh, Leonard Green, Asit P. Basu, Joel Myerson et al.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

A discounting framework for trade‐offs between risk and delay

Yu‐Hua Yeh, Leonard Green, Asit P. Basu, Joel Myerson, M. Stephen Sheldon
article en

Abstract

Every day we encounter situations in which decisions require trade-offs between the delay to one reward and the likelihood of receiving another reward. The current study was designed to extend a general discounting framework to gain insights into this fundamental trade-off process. Forty-three undergraduates adjusted the probability of receiving an immediate hypothetical monetary reward (either $200 or $10,000) until that probabilistic reward was judged subjectively equal in value to the same reward received with certainty after a delay (ranging from 1 month to 25 years). We replicated previous findings that demonstrated a linear relation between log(delay) and log(odds-against), derived from the subjective probabilistic values. This linear relation was predicted when these choices were analyzed with the hyperboloid functions that describe simple delay and probability discounting in human decision making. Additionally, we extended the discounting framework and showed that the trade-off between risk and delay was well described by a modified hyperboloid discounting model (R<sup>2</sup>s = .99). These findings suggest that the discounting framework provides a valuable approach for capturing complexities of human decision making.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of BehaviorVol. 124(2)
Illinois College (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A discounting framework for trade‐offs between risk and delay — Yu‐Hua Yeh, Leonard Green, et al. · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS