Fick and Fokker–Planck problems: A finite element comparison

We consider two diffusion processes modeled by the Fick and Fokker–Planck continuity equations when the diffusion coefficient depends on the temperature and obeys an Arrhenius formula. For both problems, we present an unifying numerical framework in order to study and compare the differences and physical consequences of each approach. The numerical study is based on the theory of the finite element method, where the use of stabilization procedures becomes fundamental in order to obtain accurate solutions. In the process, we provide existence and uniqueness of solutions and present different numerical schemes for approximation. An exhaustive numerical study is performed, where optimal convergence is provided, the idea of the need of stabilization is presented, and the analysis of a problem related to real-world scenarios is detailed in depth, where we quantify the difference in both formulations and study the impact of different physical terms, through the Péclet and Damköhler numbers. All the analysis is valid under mild assumptions on data, for general two and three-dimensional domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0280039
Primary Topic
Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fick and Fokker–Planck problems: A finite element comparison

Cristián Acevedo, Alejandro Allendes, G. Sepúlveda, A. Jaques et al.
Physics of Fluids
Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
article

Fick and Fokker–Planck problems: A finite element comparison

Cristián Acevedo, Alejandro Allendes, G. Sepúlveda, A. Jaques, Gilberto Campaña, César Naranjo
article en

Abstract

We consider two diffusion processes modeled by the Fick and Fokker–Planck continuity equations when the diffusion coefficient depends on the temperature and obeys an Arrhenius formula. For both problems, we present an unifying numerical framework in order to study and compare the differences and physical consequences of each approach. The numerical study is based on the theory of the finite element method, where the use of stabilization procedures becomes fundamental in order to obtain accurate solutions. In the process, we provide existence and uniqueness of solutions and present different numerical schemes for approximation. An exhaustive numerical study is performed, where optimal convergence is provided, the idea of the need of stabilization is presented, and the analysis of a problem related to real-world scenarios is detailed in depth, where we quantify the difference in both formulations and study the impact of different physical terms, through the Péclet and Damköhler numbers. All the analysis is valid under mild assumptions on data, for general two and three-dimensional domains.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(9)
Centro Científico Tecnológico de Valparaíso (CL), Federico Santa María Technical University (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.