Advantages and Disadvantages of Long‑Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC): An Evidence‑Based Review

Long‑acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs)—including copper intrauterine devices (IUDs), levonorgestrel‑releasing IUDs, and the etonogestrel implant—are the most effective reversible methods of contraception. This narrative review synthesizes clinical efficacy and safety data together with evidence on awareness and misconceptions, with emphasis on adolescents and young adults. LARCs offer top‑tier effectiveness (<1% typical‑use failure), high continuation and satisfaction, rapid return to fertility, and important non‑contraceptive benefits (e.g., treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding). Disadvantages include insertion requirements, bleeding changes, rare complications (expulsion and perforation), and persistent knowledge gaps that limit uptake. Evidence‑informed counseling, trained providers, and removal of cost barriers are key to maximizing benefits while minimizing harms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Carcinogenesis
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64149/j.carcinog.24.3s.39-42
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advantages and Disadvantages of Long‑Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC): An Evidence‑Based Review

Journal of Carcinogenesis
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Advantages and Disadvantages of Long‑Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC): An Evidence‑Based Review

article en

Abstract

Long‑acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs)—including copper intrauterine devices (IUDs), levonorgestrel‑releasing IUDs, and the etonogestrel implant—are the most effective reversible methods of contraception. This narrative review synthesizes clinical efficacy and safety data together with evidence on awareness and misconceptions, with emphasis on adolescents and young adults. LARCs offer top‑tier effectiveness (<1% typical‑use failure), high continuation and satisfaction, rapid return to fertility, and important non‑contraceptive benefits (e.g., treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding). Disadvantages include insertion requirements, bleeding changes, rare complications (expulsion and perforation), and persistent knowledge gaps that limit uptake. Evidence‑informed counseling, trained providers, and removal of cost barriers are key to maximizing benefits while minimizing harms.

Journal of CarcinogenesisVol. 24(3s)
Burdwan Medical College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.