Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey

Background: Deep learning-powered Artificial Intelligence-driven assistance offers enormous potential to improve healthcare by facilitating administrative work, diagnosis, and the treatment of chronic diseases. The gap between clinical values and the day-to-day realities of primary care practice might widen if AI is not successfully incorporated. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate healthcare professionals' perceptions and understanding of AI within a clinical setting. The study was conducted among 456 Health care Workers from May to November 2024. Results: Among 456 participants, 55.7% were MBBS students/interns, and 37.9% were postgraduates/professionals. More than 50% supported AI integration, and 62.3% of MBBS students/interns believed AI would change their roles, compared to 30.3% of postgraduates. Additionally, 72.1% of MBBS students/interns felt AI might take over part of their roles, whereas 46.04% of postgraduates disagreed. AI usage varied, with 62% of MBBS students/interns rarely using it for research but 72.8% often using it for idea generation, while 60% of postgraduates found AI difficult to apply. The primary barrier to AI adoption was a lack of experience and understanding (59%), highlighting the need for improved AI literacy. Conclusion: Many participants had first-hand experience with AI tools and a basic comprehension of the technology, and the majority were aware of the expanding significance of AI in medicine. Despite respondents' favourable opinions of AI integration, questions concerning accuracy, dependability, and medicolegal implications persist, indicating the need for more study and approaches to deal with these problems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55691/2582-3868.1261
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey

R Nikhil, B Shashirekha, Mahabaleshwar Mamadapur, Harshwardhan Patil et al.
1 citations
Digital Journal of Clinical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey

R Nikhil, B Shashirekha, Mahabaleshwar Mamadapur, Harshwardhan Patil, K. Divya, Purna Bansal, Hema Sameera Pinnam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Deep learning-powered Artificial Intelligence-driven assistance offers enormous potential to improve healthcare by facilitating administrative work, diagnosis, and the treatment of chronic diseases. The gap between clinical values and the day-to-day realities of primary care practice might widen if AI is not successfully incorporated. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate healthcare professionals' perceptions and understanding of AI within a clinical setting. The study was conducted among 456 Health care Workers from May to November 2024. Results: Among 456 participants, 55.7% were MBBS students/interns, and 37.9% were postgraduates/professionals. More than 50% supported AI integration, and 62.3% of MBBS students/interns believed AI would change their roles, compared to 30.3% of postgraduates. Additionally, 72.1% of MBBS students/interns felt AI might take over part of their roles, whereas 46.04% of postgraduates disagreed. AI usage varied, with 62% of MBBS students/interns rarely using it for research but 72.8% often using it for idea generation, while 60% of postgraduates found AI difficult to apply. The primary barrier to AI adoption was a lack of experience and understanding (59%), highlighting the need for improved AI literacy. Conclusion: Many participants had first-hand experience with AI tools and a basic comprehension of the technology, and the majority were aware of the expanding significance of AI in medicine. Despite respondents' favourable opinions of AI integration, questions concerning accuracy, dependability, and medicolegal implications persist, indicating the need for more study and approaches to deal with these problems.

Digital Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.