Relaparotomy After Cesarean Delivery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Background: Relaparotomy after cesarean delivery (CD) is rare but high‑impact. Incidence ranges from ~0.16% to ~1.04% and most re‑operations occur within 24 hours, typically for bleeding (Amikam et al., 2024; Mandal et al., 2021; Raagab et al., 2014). Objective: To synthesize contemporary evidence on epidemiology, timing, risk factors, indications, operative strategies, outcomes, and prevention. Sources: Retrospective case–control and cohort studies, prospective series, and supportive literature on postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), infection, and wound complications (Levin et al., 2012; Lurie, 2007; Kessous et al., 2012; Shinar et al., 2013; Pencolé et al., 2021). Conclusions: Bleeding is the leading indication. Independent risks span pregnancy (placenta previa/abruption, hypertensive disorders, multiples, fibroids, Müllerian anomalies, ART conception) and intrapartum/intraoperative factors (emergency or second‑stage CD, prolonged/complicated surgery, heavy bleeding). Timely escalation—uterotonics, compression sutures/balloon, stepwise devascularization, and when necessary hysterectomy—can reduce morbidity (Amikam et al., 2024; Raagab et al., 2014; Mandal et al., 2021; Peker et al., 2020).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Carcinogenesis
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64149/j.carcinog.24.3s.43-46
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relaparotomy After Cesarean Delivery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Journal of Carcinogenesis
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Relaparotomy After Cesarean Delivery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

article en

Abstract

Background: Relaparotomy after cesarean delivery (CD) is rare but high‑impact. Incidence ranges from ~0.16% to ~1.04% and most re‑operations occur within 24 hours, typically for bleeding (Amikam et al., 2024; Mandal et al., 2021; Raagab et al., 2014). Objective: To synthesize contemporary evidence on epidemiology, timing, risk factors, indications, operative strategies, outcomes, and prevention. Sources: Retrospective case–control and cohort studies, prospective series, and supportive literature on postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), infection, and wound complications (Levin et al., 2012; Lurie, 2007; Kessous et al., 2012; Shinar et al., 2013; Pencolé et al., 2021). Conclusions: Bleeding is the leading indication. Independent risks span pregnancy (placenta previa/abruption, hypertensive disorders, multiples, fibroids, Müllerian anomalies, ART conception) and intrapartum/intraoperative factors (emergency or second‑stage CD, prolonged/complicated surgery, heavy bleeding). Timely escalation—uterotonics, compression sutures/balloon, stepwise devascularization, and when necessary hysterectomy—can reduce morbidity (Amikam et al., 2024; Raagab et al., 2014; Mandal et al., 2021; Peker et al., 2020).

Journal of CarcinogenesisVol. 24(3s)
Bankura Sammilani Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relaparotomy After Cesarean Delivery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review · Journal of Carcinogenesis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS