Barriers and Enablers for Sustaining Nurse-Led Use of Clinical Decision Support Tools for Antibiotic Stewardship: A qualitative analysis (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Clinical decision support (CDS) tools embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) in the form of integrated clinical prediction rules (iCPRs) provide a potentially effective intervention to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Still, their effectiveness has been limited by workflow barriers and low adoption by healthcare providers. Nurses are well-positioned to implement evidence-based protocols using clinical decision support (CDS) tools. In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, a nurse-led implementation strategy for ARI iCPRs was evaluated for use in primary care and urgent care settings. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> After trial completion, this study examined nurse and nurse leader perspectives on the sustainability of an EHR-integrated clinical decision support tool for antibiotic stewardship and explored factors influencing its potential long-term integration into ambulatory nursing practice. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We interviewed 22 nurses and nurse leaders from clinics that participated in the clinical trial. Two semi-structured interview guides, one for nurses and one for nursing leadership, were developed to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementing a decision-aid tool for nurses and to elicit challenges specific to nursing interactions with the CDS tool. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using thematic content analysis and iterative coding, our team collaboratively identified emerging themes related to sustainability and refined the results with consensus. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Five themes emerged: 1) importance of staffing stability and capacity; 2) impact of dedicated clinic resource availability; 3) variable nurse readiness with CDS-guided clinical care; 4) influence of openness to change and a nurse-supportive clinic culture; and 5) ongoing need for training and support. Specific recommendations for future actions were also noted. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Our findings revealed specific barriers and facilitators to the sustainability of a CDS tool from the nursing perspective that can inform further implementation of nurse-led delegation protocols in the ambulatory setting. Future solutions should consider mapping physical workflows, scheduling specific to nurse visits, continuing education, and treating cough and sore throat as two distinct processes. </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.83567
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and Enablers for Sustaining Nurse-Led Use of Clinical Decision Support Tools for Antibiotic Stewardship: A qualitative analysis (Preprint)

David Mann, Lynn Xu, Rachel Hess, Natalie Henning et al.
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Barriers and Enablers for Sustaining Nurse-Led Use of Clinical Decision Support Tools for Antibiotic Stewardship: A qualitative analysis (Preprint)

David Mann, Lynn Xu, Rachel Hess, Natalie Henning, Haddy Bah, Elizabeth R. Stevens, Victoria L. Tiase, Kimberly E. McHugh, David Feldstein, Alice Yuroff, Mariana Braga, Aurie Tovar
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Clinical decision support (CDS) tools embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) in the form of integrated clinical prediction rules (iCPRs) provide a potentially effective intervention to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Still, their effectiveness has been limited by workflow barriers and low adoption by healthcare providers. Nurses are well-positioned to implement evidence-based protocols using clinical decision support (CDS) tools. In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, a nurse-led implementation strategy for ARI iCPRs was evaluated for use in primary care and urgent care settings. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> After trial completion, this study examined nurse and nurse leader perspectives on the sustainability of an EHR-integrated clinical decision support tool for antibiotic stewardship and explored factors influencing its potential long-term integration into ambulatory nursing practice. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We interviewed 22 nurses and nurse leaders from clinics that participated in the clinical trial. Two semi-structured interview guides, one for nurses and one for nursing leadership, were developed to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementing a decision-aid tool for nurses and to elicit challenges specific to nursing interactions with the CDS tool. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using thematic content analysis and iterative coding, our team collaboratively identified emerging themes related to sustainability and refined the results with consensus. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Five themes emerged: 1) importance of staffing stability and capacity; 2) impact of dedicated clinic resource availability; 3) variable nurse readiness with CDS-guided clinical care; 4) influence of openness to change and a nurse-supportive clinic culture; and 5) ongoing need for training and support. Specific recommendations for future actions were also noted. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Our findings revealed specific barriers and facilitators to the sustainability of a CDS tool from the nursing perspective that can inform further implementation of nurse-led delegation protocols in the ambulatory setting. Future solutions should consider mapping physical workflows, scheduling specific to nurse visits, continuing education, and treating cough and sore throat as two distinct processes. </sec>

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.