KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN KETENAGAKERJAAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 2 TAHUN 2004 DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TAHUN 2014

This study aims to examine the legality of labor inspection determinations issued by Labor Inspectors in resolving disputes over overtime wages, in light of Law No. 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement and Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. The research method employed is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings reveal that the authority of Labor Inspectors to issue determinations or re-determinations regarding overtime wage disputes, as regulated in Minister of Manpower Regulation No. 33 of 2016 jo. Minister of Manpower Regulation No. 1 of 2020, lacks a strong legal foundation, as it contradicts the dispute settlement mechanisms stipulated in Law No. 2 of 2004. Furthermore, such actions violate the principles of good governance under Law No. 30 of 2014 and potentially prolong the resolution process of industrial relations disputes. Therefore, the provisions within the Ministerial Regulation granting authority to Labor Inspectors to issue determinations or re-determinations are legally invalid.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Juris
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v9i1.1754
Primary Topic
Marriage and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN KETENAGAKERJAAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 2 TAHUN 2004 DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TAHUN 2014

Muhammad Fahruddin, Nason Nadeak
The Juris
Marriage and Family Dynamics
article

KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN KETENAGAKERJAAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 2 TAHUN 2004 DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TAHUN 2014

Muhammad Fahruddin, Nason Nadeak
article en

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legality of labor inspection determinations issued by Labor Inspectors in resolving disputes over overtime wages, in light of Law No. 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement and Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. The research method employed is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings reveal that the authority of Labor Inspectors to issue determinations or re-determinations regarding overtime wage disputes, as regulated in Minister of Manpower Regulation No. 33 of 2016 jo. Minister of Manpower Regulation No. 1 of 2020, lacks a strong legal foundation, as it contradicts the dispute settlement mechanisms stipulated in Law No. 2 of 2004. Furthermore, such actions violate the principles of good governance under Law No. 30 of 2014 and potentially prolong the resolution process of industrial relations disputes. Therefore, the provisions within the Ministerial Regulation granting authority to Labor Inspectors to issue determinations or re-determinations are legally invalid.

The JurisVol. 9(1)
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Marriage and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.