Improving Engineering Accreditation in United States Programs - Investigating Why ABET Accreditation is Superficial and Misguided

The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) is the sole accreditation organization for engineering programs in the United States. Over time, it has expanded in influence. Programs are often viewed as not viable if they cannot receive ABET accreditation. However, little analysis has been done to determine what value ABET accreditation adds. Several references in the literature have discussed the burden of meeting ABET accreditation without clear benefits. Others have noted that the process has failed to adapt to modern program requirements and does not practice continuous improvement. This Work-In-Progress paper is an attempt to determine the benefits or detriments of ABET accreditation, which can be valuable to determine future best practices for engineering accreditation in the United States.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isec64801.2025.11147297
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Engineering Accreditation in United States Programs - Investigating Why ABET Accreditation is Superficial and Misguided

William S. Edwards, Frank M. Washko, Leslie A. Washko, Shahlaa Al Wakeel
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Improving Engineering Accreditation in United States Programs - Investigating Why ABET Accreditation is Superficial and Misguided

William S. Edwards, Frank M. Washko, Leslie A. Washko, Shahlaa Al Wakeel
article en

Abstract

The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) is the sole accreditation organization for engineering programs in the United States. Over time, it has expanded in influence. Programs are often viewed as not viable if they cannot receive ABET accreditation. However, little analysis has been done to determine what value ABET accreditation adds. Several references in the literature have discussed the burden of meeting ABET accreditation without clear benefits. Others have noted that the process has failed to adapt to modern program requirements and does not practice continuous improvement. This Work-In-Progress paper is an attempt to determine the benefits or detriments of ABET accreditation, which can be valuable to determine future best practices for engineering accreditation in the United States.

Saint Martin's University (US), Kettering University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving Engineering Accreditation in United States Programs - Investigating Why ABET Accreditation is Superficial and Misguided — William S. Edwards, Frank M. Washko, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS