Classification and Prediction of Wafer Yield Using Gradient Boosting Algorithms: A Focus on Lithography Inline Parameters

Yield is one of the most critical driving factors in the semiconductor industry. Much time and resources are spent improving yield by identifying and solving problems. A yield prediction method will reduce the time and cost spent on yield improvement measures by indicating early process problems. Our investigation predicted the wafer test yield using the lithography process inline parameters. We consider different variants of the gradient boosting algorithm to compare the prediction results. Two years of real production data was used to train, validate, and evaluate the different algorithms. Following the proposed algorithm, the Classification algorithm predicts yield better than the numerical algorithm. Among the classification algorithms, CatBoost shows the highest accuracy of 98.54%, whereas the best Mean Absolute error (MAE) of 0.88 is indicated by the gradient boosting regressor among numerical algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmi65310.2025.11141195
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification and Prediction of Wafer Yield Using Gradient Boosting Algorithms: A Focus on Lithography Inline Parameters

Maruf A. Dhali, M. N. Islam, Md Tarekul Islam
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

Classification and Prediction of Wafer Yield Using Gradient Boosting Algorithms: A Focus on Lithography Inline Parameters

Maruf A. Dhali, M. N. Islam, Md Tarekul Islam
article en

Abstract

Yield is one of the most critical driving factors in the semiconductor industry. Much time and resources are spent improving yield by identifying and solving problems. A yield prediction method will reduce the time and cost spent on yield improvement measures by indicating early process problems. Our investigation predicted the wafer test yield using the lithography process inline parameters. We consider different variants of the gradient boosting algorithm to compare the prediction results. Two years of real production data was used to train, validate, and evaluate the different algorithms. Following the proposed algorithm, the Classification algorithm predicts yield better than the numerical algorithm. Among the classification algorithms, CatBoost shows the highest accuracy of 98.54%, whereas the best Mean Absolute error (MAE) of 0.88 is indicated by the gradient boosting regressor among numerical algorithms.

Infineon Technologies (Germany) (DE), University of Groningen (NL), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.