Scoping reviews: an approach to co-creation through consultation

This paper introduces ‘co-creation through consultation’, a method providing structured direction for implementing, reporting and evaluating knowledge user engagement in scoping reviews. Drawing on our experience conducting a Best Evidence in Medical Education (BEME) scoping review, we retrospectively detail our ‘co-creation through consultation’ method. We outline our preparation, engagement strategies and ongoing consultation processes, highlighting knowledge user recruitment and methodological considerations. Our reflections underscore the significant influence of the impact of engaged research on the review’s outcomes and demonstrate the relevance and applicability of our scoping review findings. Our structured approach allowed for meaningful input from knowledge users without extensive time commitments. We present our approach with the intention of advancing the processes of engaging knowledge users in scoping reviews. We also advocate for transparent reporting of engagement processes in health professions education scoping reviews to promote evidence-informed practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Healthcare Simulation
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54531/nrzc6853
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scoping reviews: an approach to co-creation through consultation

Frank Coffey, Debra Nestel, Walter Eppich, Michelle O’Toole et al.
2 citations
Journal of Healthcare Simulation
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
1.70
article

Scoping reviews: an approach to co-creation through consultation

Frank Coffey, Debra Nestel, Walter Eppich, Michelle O’Toole, Nancy McNaughton, Andrea J. Doyle, Clare Sullivan, Heather Colquhoun, Claire Mulhall, Claire Condron, Michael Anderson, Ronald K. S. Macaulay
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper introduces ‘co-creation through consultation’, a method providing structured direction for implementing, reporting and evaluating knowledge user engagement in scoping reviews. Drawing on our experience conducting a Best Evidence in Medical Education (BEME) scoping review, we retrospectively detail our ‘co-creation through consultation’ method. We outline our preparation, engagement strategies and ongoing consultation processes, highlighting knowledge user recruitment and methodological considerations. Our reflections underscore the significant influence of the impact of engaged research on the review’s outcomes and demonstrate the relevance and applicability of our scoping review findings. Our structured approach allowed for meaningful input from knowledge users without extensive time commitments. We present our approach with the intention of advancing the processes of engaging knowledge users in scoping reviews. We also advocate for transparent reporting of engagement processes in health professions education scoping reviews to promote evidence-informed practices.

Journal of Healthcare Simulation
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.