Large-scale composite hypothesis testing procedure for omics data analyses

Composite hypothesis testing using summary statistics is a well-established approach for assessing the effect of a single marker or gene across multiple traits or omics levels. Numerous procedures have been developed for this task and have been successfully applied to identify complex patterns of association between traits, conditions, or phenotypes. However, existing methods often struggle with scalability in large datasets or fail to account for dependencies between traits or omics levels, limiting their ability to control false positives effectively. To overcome these challenges, we present the qch_copula approach, which integrates mixture models with a copula function to capture dependencies between traits or omics and provides rigorously defined <i>P</i>-values for any composite hypothesis. Through a comprehensive benchmark against eight state-of-the-art methods, we demonstrate that qch_copula controls Type I error rates effectively while enhancing the detection of joint association patterns. Compared to other mixture model-based approaches, our method notably reduces memory usage during the EM algorithm, allowing the analysis of up to 20 traits and 10<sup>5</sup>-10<sup>6</sup> markers. The effectiveness of qch_copula is further validated through two application cases in human and plant genetics. The method is available in the R package qch, accessible on CRAN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaf118
Primary Topic
Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large-scale composite hypothesis testing procedure for omics data analyses

Nathalie Boissot, Franck Gauthier, Tristan Mary‐Huard, Alain Charcosset et al.
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
article

Large-scale composite hypothesis testing procedure for omics data analyses

Nathalie Boissot, Franck Gauthier, Tristan Mary‐Huard, Alain Charcosset, Annaïg De Walsche
article en

Abstract

Composite hypothesis testing using summary statistics is a well-established approach for assessing the effect of a single marker or gene across multiple traits or omics levels. Numerous procedures have been developed for this task and have been successfully applied to identify complex patterns of association between traits, conditions, or phenotypes. However, existing methods often struggle with scalability in large datasets or fail to account for dependencies between traits or omics levels, limiting their ability to control false positives effectively. To overcome these challenges, we present the qch_copula approach, which integrates mixture models with a copula function to capture dependencies between traits or omics and provides rigorously defined <i>P</i>-values for any composite hypothesis. Through a comprehensive benchmark against eight state-of-the-art methods, we demonstrate that qch_copula controls Type I error rates effectively while enhancing the detection of joint association patterns. Compared to other mixture model-based approaches, our method notably reduces memory usage during the EM algorithm, allowing the analysis of up to 20 traits and 10<sup>5</sup>-10<sup>6</sup> markers. The effectiveness of qch_copula is further validated through two application cases in human and plant genetics. The method is available in the R package qch, accessible on CRAN.

NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsVol. 7(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Génétique Quantitative et Évolution Le Moulon (FR), Génétique et amélioration des fruits et légumes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.