Machine Learning-based Prediction of Hypotension During Anesthesia Induction

Background: Hypotension is a common complication during the induction of anesthesia, leading to adverse outcomes such as acute kidney injury (AKI), myocardial injury, and, in high-risk patients, death. Objectives: This study aimed to predict post-induction hypotension (PIH) by considering clinical interventions using machine learning (ML) methods. Methods: Prior to the induction phase of anesthesia, patient data were collected, and cardiac monitoring was set to measure non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) at 1-minute intervals. Afterwards, induction was performed by the anesthesiologist. Hypotension was assessed 30 minutes after induction, defined as either a 20% drop in mean arterial pressure (MAP), an absolute MAP below 65 mmHg, or a systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 90 mmHg. The ML techniques were employed to develop a real-time hypotension predictor. These models utilize data gathered from five minutes to predict occurrences of hypotension in the next 10 minutes. Feature selection methods such as dimension reduction and sequential feature selection algorithms were utilized to provide more informative inputs to the ML models. Static features such as clinical features and dynamic features like vital signs were collected from patients undergoing general anesthesia across multiple hospital centers. Among the 215 patients, 110 developed PIH. Results: Without employing feature selection methods, the best performance belongs to the random forest (RF) model, with an accuracy of 88.3%, precision of 87.6%, recall of 85%, and an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) at 0.945. Moreover, when utilizing feature selection methods, the RF model retained its status as the best model, with accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC-ROC values of 88.1%, 88.1%, 85.5%, and 0.947, respectively. Conclusions: We discovered that ML models hold the potential to predict PIH within the subsequent 10 minutes by utilizing data collected five minutes prior. Furthermore, considering clinical interventions, such as the patient's position and type of anesthetic drug injection, have a positive impact on the performance of ML models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/jcma-151664
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-based Prediction of Hypotension During Anesthesia Induction

Maryam Vosoughian, Soudeh Tabashi, Ardeshir Tajbakhsh, Azar Ejmalian et al.
Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Machine Learning-based Prediction of Hypotension During Anesthesia Induction

Maryam Vosoughian, Soudeh Tabashi, Ardeshir Tajbakhsh, Azar Ejmalian, Ahmad Ali Abin, Shahabedin Nabavi, Hossein Sheikhi, Sana Hashemi
article en

Abstract

Background: Hypotension is a common complication during the induction of anesthesia, leading to adverse outcomes such as acute kidney injury (AKI), myocardial injury, and, in high-risk patients, death. Objectives: This study aimed to predict post-induction hypotension (PIH) by considering clinical interventions using machine learning (ML) methods. Methods: Prior to the induction phase of anesthesia, patient data were collected, and cardiac monitoring was set to measure non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) at 1-minute intervals. Afterwards, induction was performed by the anesthesiologist. Hypotension was assessed 30 minutes after induction, defined as either a 20% drop in mean arterial pressure (MAP), an absolute MAP below 65 mmHg, or a systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 90 mmHg. The ML techniques were employed to develop a real-time hypotension predictor. These models utilize data gathered from five minutes to predict occurrences of hypotension in the next 10 minutes. Feature selection methods such as dimension reduction and sequential feature selection algorithms were utilized to provide more informative inputs to the ML models. Static features such as clinical features and dynamic features like vital signs were collected from patients undergoing general anesthesia across multiple hospital centers. Among the 215 patients, 110 developed PIH. Results: Without employing feature selection methods, the best performance belongs to the random forest (RF) model, with an accuracy of 88.3%, precision of 87.6%, recall of 85%, and an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) at 0.945. Moreover, when utilizing feature selection methods, the RF model retained its status as the best model, with accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC-ROC values of 88.1%, 88.1%, 85.5%, and 0.947, respectively. Conclusions: We discovered that ML models hold the potential to predict PIH within the subsequent 10 minutes by utilizing data collected five minutes prior. Furthermore, considering clinical interventions, such as the patient's position and type of anesthetic drug injection, have a positive impact on the performance of ML models.

Journal of Cellular & Molecular AnesthesiaVol. 10(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.