Սահմանը և նշանը

The act of demarcating a border is not merely a geographical, military, political, or economic phenomenon; it is also a cultural one. It functions not only as a defense mechanism but also as a unique communication system, incorporating the placement of certain structures and signs along the border. The article goes on to explore the function of these signs, their location, and the reasons for their specific use. The article then attempts to classify these signs, present their architectural and iconographic features, and highlight their ritualistic functions at the border. The article also examines the organisational, ideological, and cultural potential of these signs for border communities and settlements. The multifaceted nature of border signs is also discussed, insofar as they are not merely perceived as territorial delimiters, but also studied for their role as unique symbols of nationalism, identity, and communication. A semiotic analysis of border markings is undertaken, exploring the symbolic meanings behind various signs and how they shape the cultural and political discourse of the border. The research focuses primarily on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border, drawing parallels with examples from the Tavush, Gegharkunik, and Syunik regions. The study places particular emphasis on the examination of religiously significant border markers or indicators, such as khachkars and cross-based structures, as these types of signs frequently become primary targets during periods of conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and Culture
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46991/hc.2024.21.2.235
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Սահմանը և նշանը

Անուշ Սաֆարյան
History and Culture
European and International Law Studies
article

Սահմանը և նշանը

Անուշ Սաֆարյան
article en

Abstract

The act of demarcating a border is not merely a geographical, military, political, or economic phenomenon; it is also a cultural one. It functions not only as a defense mechanism but also as a unique communication system, incorporating the placement of certain structures and signs along the border. The article goes on to explore the function of these signs, their location, and the reasons for their specific use. The article then attempts to classify these signs, present their architectural and iconographic features, and highlight their ritualistic functions at the border. The article also examines the organisational, ideological, and cultural potential of these signs for border communities and settlements. The multifaceted nature of border signs is also discussed, insofar as they are not merely perceived as territorial delimiters, but also studied for their role as unique symbols of nationalism, identity, and communication. A semiotic analysis of border markings is undertaken, exploring the symbolic meanings behind various signs and how they shape the cultural and political discourse of the border. The research focuses primarily on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border, drawing parallels with examples from the Tavush, Gegharkunik, and Syunik regions. The study places particular emphasis on the examination of religiously significant border markers or indicators, such as khachkars and cross-based structures, as these types of signs frequently become primary targets during periods of conflict.

History and CultureVol. 21(2)
Human Growth Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Սահմանը և նշանը — Անուշ Սաֆարյան · History and Culture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS