How We Type with Word Suggestions: Understanding Visual Attention and Checking Behavior during Mobile Text Input

Word suggestions are commonly used when people type on mobile devices. However, how users adjust their typing behavior and visual attention to integrate the use of word suggestions and whether they are effective in doing so remains unclear, mainly due to the lack of gaze data in realistic settings. In this paper, we conduct an eye-tracking study of word suggestion users transcribing and composing text on their own phones and keyboards. Our analysis reveals that users frequently checked the suggestion list without picking a suggestion, yielding a 68% failure rate. Screen recordings show that only about half of these Failed Suggestions can be attributed to the algorithm's performance. In 43.6% of cases, users typed the word manually even though they fixated on the correctly suggested word. We analyze the dynamics of users' checking behavior and quantify the time cost of checking for word suggestions. Overall, we find that despite using word suggestions on a daily basis, users' checking behavior is not well aligned with the performance of the suggestion algorithm, resulting in a decrease of typing speed. These findings have implications for the design of intelligent text entry systems and AI support in general, and our WS-Gaze dataset will support future research in this important direction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3749520
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How We Type with Word Suggestions: Understanding Visual Attention and Checking Behavior during Mobile Text Input

Anna Maria Feit, Yang Li
1 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
1.94
article

How We Type with Word Suggestions: Understanding Visual Attention and Checking Behavior during Mobile Text Input

Anna Maria Feit, Yang Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Word suggestions are commonly used when people type on mobile devices. However, how users adjust their typing behavior and visual attention to integrate the use of word suggestions and whether they are effective in doing so remains unclear, mainly due to the lack of gaze data in realistic settings. In this paper, we conduct an eye-tracking study of word suggestion users transcribing and composing text on their own phones and keyboards. Our analysis reveals that users frequently checked the suggestion list without picking a suggestion, yielding a 68% failure rate. Screen recordings show that only about half of these Failed Suggestions can be attributed to the algorithm's performance. In 43.6% of cases, users typed the word manually even though they fixated on the correctly suggested word. We analyze the dynamics of users' checking behavior and quantify the time cost of checking for word suggestions. Overall, we find that despite using word suggestions on a daily basis, users' checking behavior is not well aligned with the performance of the suggestion algorithm, resulting in a decrease of typing speed. These findings have implications for the design of intelligent text entry systems and AI support in general, and our WS-Gaze dataset will support future research in this important direction.

Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous TechnologiesVol. 9(3)
Saarland University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.