Gender and armed conflict

Abstract This article synthesizes the quantitative literature on the relationship between gender and armed conflict, focusing on two key perspectives: women as victims and women as agents. It first reviews research on the consequences of conflict for women and girls, highlighting both direct effects—such as gender-based violence and forced displacement—and indirect effects in post-conflict settings, including declines in personal security, education, economic outcomes, and health. The article then shifts to examine women’s political roles in conflict, whether as participants in resistance movements or as peace-builders and agents of post-conflict reconstruction. While there is a growing body of innovative research on these critical issues, significant opportunities remain for further empirical and experimental work, particularly studies that seek to establish causal mechanisms and expand our understanding of gendered dynamics in settings damaged by conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Policy
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiaf010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender and armed conflict

María Micaela Sviatschi, Siwan Anderson
1 citations
Economic Policy
Gender, Security, and Conflict
3.87
article

Gender and armed conflict

María Micaela Sviatschi, Siwan Anderson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article synthesizes the quantitative literature on the relationship between gender and armed conflict, focusing on two key perspectives: women as victims and women as agents. It first reviews research on the consequences of conflict for women and girls, highlighting both direct effects—such as gender-based violence and forced displacement—and indirect effects in post-conflict settings, including declines in personal security, education, economic outcomes, and health. The article then shifts to examine women’s political roles in conflict, whether as participants in resistance movements or as peace-builders and agents of post-conflict reconstruction. While there is a growing body of innovative research on these critical issues, significant opportunities remain for further empirical and experimental work, particularly studies that seek to establish causal mechanisms and expand our understanding of gendered dynamics in settings damaged by conflict.

Economic PolicyVol. 40(124)
University of British Columbia (CA), Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.