Modern approaches and methods for assessing enterprise investment attractiveness

The paper investigates the theoretical underpinnings of enterprise investment attractiveness, offering a comprehensive analysis of its conceptual foundations and methodological approaches. Investment attractiveness is understood as an integrative characteristic that reflects both the internal capabilities and external conditions determining an enterprise’s potential to secure and effectively utilise capital. The study begins by mapping out diverse definitions found in Ukrainian and international scholarship, emphasising the absence of a universally accepted interpretation and highlighting the multifaceted nature of the concept. It then categorises the drivers of investment attractiveness into internal factors – such as managerial competence, financial stability, human capital, and operational efficiency – and external factors encompassing macroeconomic stability, regulatory environment, market infrastructure, and socio-political conditions. Subsequently, key assessment methods are examined in detail. The expert appraisal method leverages specialist judgments to weight qualitative and quantitative indicators, while the rating method assigns scores to standard financial metrics to produce a comparative index. Integral evaluation condenses multiple parameters into a single coefficient, facilitating cross-company benchmarking, whereas comparative analysis juxtaposes firm-level data against industry averages. Matrix techniques (e.g., risk–return mapping) and profitability-risk “triangles” are considered for their strategic planning utility, and differentiated approaches are discussed for their ability to tailor criteria to specific operational domains. The paper argues that no single method is sufficient; rather, a hybrid framework that combines complementary techniques can yield more robust and context-sensitive insights. Finally, the research underscores the importance of aligning methodological choices with investor objectives, industry characteristics, and data availability. Practical recommendations are provided for implementing adaptive evaluation systems that enhance transparency, reduce uncertainty, and support informed decision-making. By integrating theoretical perspectives with applied tools, the paper contributes to the development of resilient investment strategies capable of navigating dynamic economic landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Finances Law
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2025.6.6
Primary Topic
Economic and Business Development Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern approaches and methods for assessing enterprise investment attractiveness

Yevhen VYSOCHYN
Economics Finances Law
Economic and Business Development Strategies
article

Modern approaches and methods for assessing enterprise investment attractiveness

Yevhen VYSOCHYN
article en

Abstract

The paper investigates the theoretical underpinnings of enterprise investment attractiveness, offering a comprehensive analysis of its conceptual foundations and methodological approaches. Investment attractiveness is understood as an integrative characteristic that reflects both the internal capabilities and external conditions determining an enterprise’s potential to secure and effectively utilise capital. The study begins by mapping out diverse definitions found in Ukrainian and international scholarship, emphasising the absence of a universally accepted interpretation and highlighting the multifaceted nature of the concept. It then categorises the drivers of investment attractiveness into internal factors – such as managerial competence, financial stability, human capital, and operational efficiency – and external factors encompassing macroeconomic stability, regulatory environment, market infrastructure, and socio-political conditions. Subsequently, key assessment methods are examined in detail. The expert appraisal method leverages specialist judgments to weight qualitative and quantitative indicators, while the rating method assigns scores to standard financial metrics to produce a comparative index. Integral evaluation condenses multiple parameters into a single coefficient, facilitating cross-company benchmarking, whereas comparative analysis juxtaposes firm-level data against industry averages. Matrix techniques (e.g., risk–return mapping) and profitability-risk “triangles” are considered for their strategic planning utility, and differentiated approaches are discussed for their ability to tailor criteria to specific operational domains. The paper argues that no single method is sufficient; rather, a hybrid framework that combines complementary techniques can yield more robust and context-sensitive insights. Finally, the research underscores the importance of aligning methodological choices with investor objectives, industry characteristics, and data availability. Practical recommendations are provided for implementing adaptive evaluation systems that enhance transparency, reduce uncertainty, and support informed decision-making. By integrating theoretical perspectives with applied tools, the paper contributes to the development of resilient investment strategies capable of navigating dynamic economic landscapes.

Economics Finances LawVol. 6/2025(-)
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Economic and Business Development Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.