Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: experience of foreign countries and Russian prospects.

The subject of the research is electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. The object of the research consists of legal relationships arising in the course of using electronic evidence in the proof of a criminal case. The author examines such aspects of the topic as the definition and characteristics of electronic evidence, as well as ways to confirm their authenticity. The analysis is conducted both in the context of the Russian legal system, where electronic evidence does not yet have an independent regulation, and in foreign legal systems that have already developed specific norms. A comparative aspect examines the approaches of China, India, Brazil, the USA, and other countries, which allows for the identification of development trends and the proposal of directions for improving Russian legislation. The work aims to form a holistic understanding of the place and role of electronic evidence in modern criminal proceedings. The methodology of the research is based on the use of general scientific and specific scientific methods of cognition. The legal-dogmatic method is applied to interpret the content of legal norms. The formal-logical method was used to identify and study the characteristics of electronic evidence. The method of comparative legal studies allowed for the examination of foreign experience in regulating electronic evidence. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the study of relevant foreign approaches to electronic evidence and their authenticity. Various approaches have been identified that are used to ensure the authenticity and integrity of electronic evidence applied in global practice. It has been established that in most countries, considerable attention is paid to verifying the integrity of electronic evidence, and special procedural rules are introduced that allow for the objective confirmation of the preservation of evidence through digital means (electronic signatures, checksums). Based on the research results, the author formulated a definition of electronic evidence that takes into account approaches to ensuring their integrity and authenticity. A classification of electronic evidence is proposed concerning the extent to which their equivalence to original information is confirmed by digital verification means. The obtained results can be used to develop approaches to ensuring the authenticity of electronic evidence in the Russian criminal process through digital technologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Юридические исследования
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2025.9.75764
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: experience of foreign countries and Russian prospects.

Andrei Ivanovich Turshin
Юридические исследования
Education, Law, and Society
article

Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: experience of foreign countries and Russian prospects.

Andrei Ivanovich Turshin
article en

Abstract

The subject of the research is electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. The object of the research consists of legal relationships arising in the course of using electronic evidence in the proof of a criminal case. The author examines such aspects of the topic as the definition and characteristics of electronic evidence, as well as ways to confirm their authenticity. The analysis is conducted both in the context of the Russian legal system, where electronic evidence does not yet have an independent regulation, and in foreign legal systems that have already developed specific norms. A comparative aspect examines the approaches of China, India, Brazil, the USA, and other countries, which allows for the identification of development trends and the proposal of directions for improving Russian legislation. The work aims to form a holistic understanding of the place and role of electronic evidence in modern criminal proceedings. The methodology of the research is based on the use of general scientific and specific scientific methods of cognition. The legal-dogmatic method is applied to interpret the content of legal norms. The formal-logical method was used to identify and study the characteristics of electronic evidence. The method of comparative legal studies allowed for the examination of foreign experience in regulating electronic evidence. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the study of relevant foreign approaches to electronic evidence and their authenticity. Various approaches have been identified that are used to ensure the authenticity and integrity of electronic evidence applied in global practice. It has been established that in most countries, considerable attention is paid to verifying the integrity of electronic evidence, and special procedural rules are introduced that allow for the objective confirmation of the preservation of evidence through digital means (electronic signatures, checksums). Based on the research results, the author formulated a definition of electronic evidence that takes into account approaches to ensuring their integrity and authenticity. A classification of electronic evidence is proposed concerning the extent to which their equivalence to original information is confirmed by digital verification means. The obtained results can be used to develop approaches to ensuring the authenticity of electronic evidence in the Russian criminal process through digital technologies.

Юридические исследования(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.