Modeling Other Minds: A Computational Account of Social Cognition and Its Development

This article reviews how humans come to understand other minds from a computational perspective. We propose that social development is structured around three abilities: ( a ) building representations of agents and minds from a small set of abstract primitives, ( b ) embedding these representations into a probabilistic causal model of rational action, and ( c ) using this model to interpret everyday behavior. For this third ability, we argue that using a full model of other minds is too computationally demanding. To manage this, people learn how to build simplified context-specific models that balance computational efficiency with explanatory power. Learning how to build these restricted scope models may be a central but understudied aspect of development, shaped in part through everyday conversation. All together, our framework offers a formal account of social development and highlights open questions about how this capacity emerges and develops.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-111323-112016
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Other Minds: A Computational Account of Social Cognition and Its Development

Julian Jara‐Ettinger, Z. Wang, Isaac Davis
2 citations
Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
1.32
article

Modeling Other Minds: A Computational Account of Social Cognition and Its Development

Julian Jara‐Ettinger, Z. Wang, Isaac Davis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article reviews how humans come to understand other minds from a computational perspective. We propose that social development is structured around three abilities: ( a ) building representations of agents and minds from a small set of abstract primitives, ( b ) embedding these representations into a probabilistic causal model of rational action, and ( c ) using this model to interpret everyday behavior. For this third ability, we argue that using a full model of other minds is too computationally demanding. To manage this, people learn how to build simplified context-specific models that balance computational efficiency with explanatory power. Learning how to build these restricted scope models may be a central but understudied aspect of development, shaped in part through everyday conversation. All together, our framework offers a formal account of social development and highlights open questions about how this capacity emerges and develops.

Annual Review of Developmental PsychologyVol. 7(1)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling Other Minds: A Computational Account of Social Cognition and Its Development — Julian Jara‐Ettinger, Z. Wang, et al. · Annual Review of Developmental Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS