A Mixed Methods Pilot Study of an Instructor Feedback Training to Mitigate Biased Feedback Toward Minoritized Instructors

Abstract Experts have cautioned against the use of college student ratings of instruction (SRIs) in making high stakes decisions for faculty members, such as compensation and tenure, due to extraneous variables that bias student responses. This practice is especially pernicious for minoritized faculty members, with evidence to suggest student feedback to be more negatively biased and attacking in nature when given to Black women faculty members. To address this issue, we piloted a bias awareness intervention for graduate level students ( N = 57), seeking to improve feedback quality. An explanatory sequential experimental mixed-method design (Creswell, 2021) was used to compare differing levels of interventions across three groups. Findings demonstrated significant differences for those who experienced a more involved intervention and with distinctly unique qualitative feedback among the control group versus the group receiving an in-depth intervention. Outcomes suggest promising impacts of student training around feedback and bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovative Higher Education
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-025-09836-7
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed Methods Pilot Study of an Instructor Feedback Training to Mitigate Biased Feedback Toward Minoritized Instructors

Edward Wahesh, Stacey Havlik, Krista M. Malott, Amber Haley et al.
Innovative Higher Education
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

A Mixed Methods Pilot Study of an Instructor Feedback Training to Mitigate Biased Feedback Toward Minoritized Instructors

Edward Wahesh, Stacey Havlik, Krista M. Malott, Amber Haley, Lexie McClatchy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Experts have cautioned against the use of college student ratings of instruction (SRIs) in making high stakes decisions for faculty members, such as compensation and tenure, due to extraneous variables that bias student responses. This practice is especially pernicious for minoritized faculty members, with evidence to suggest student feedback to be more negatively biased and attacking in nature when given to Black women faculty members. To address this issue, we piloted a bias awareness intervention for graduate level students ( N = 57), seeking to improve feedback quality. An explanatory sequential experimental mixed-method design (Creswell, 2021) was used to compare differing levels of interventions across three groups. Findings demonstrated significant differences for those who experienced a more involved intervention and with distinctly unique qualitative feedback among the control group versus the group receiving an in-depth intervention. Outcomes suggest promising impacts of student training around feedback and bias.

Innovative Higher Education
Villanova University (US)
Villanova University
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.