Use and interpretation of signal-model indistinguishability measures for gravitational-wave astronomy

The difference (“mismatch”) between two gravitational-wave signals is often used to estimate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which they will be distinguishable in a measurement or, alternatively, when the errors in a signal model will lead to biased measurements. It is well known that the standard approach to calculate this “indistinguishability SNR” is too conservative: a model may fail the criterion at a given SNR, but not necessarily incur a biased measurement of any individual parameters. This problem can be solved by taking into account errors orthogonal to the model space (which, therefore, do not induce a bias), and calculating indistinguishability SNRs for individual parameters, rather than the full <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mi>N</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math>-dimensional parameter space. We illustrate this approach with the simple example of aligned-spin binary black hole signals, and calculate accurate estimates of the SNR at which each parameter measurement will be biased. In general, biases occur at much higher SNRs than predicted from the standard mismatch calculation. Which parameters are most easily biased depends sensitively on the details of a given waveform model, and the location in parameter space, and in some cases the bias SNR is as high as the conservative estimate. We also illustrate how the parameter bias SNR can be used to robustly specify waveform accuracy requirements for future detectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/ddz7-x9zz
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use and interpretation of signal-model indistinguishability measures for gravitational-wave astronomy

Mark Hannam, Jonathan E. Thompson, Edward Fauchon-Jones, C. G. Hoy
3 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
3.46
article

Use and interpretation of signal-model indistinguishability measures for gravitational-wave astronomy

Mark Hannam, Jonathan E. Thompson, Edward Fauchon-Jones, C. G. Hoy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The difference (“mismatch”) between two gravitational-wave signals is often used to estimate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which they will be distinguishable in a measurement or, alternatively, when the errors in a signal model will lead to biased measurements. It is well known that the standard approach to calculate this “indistinguishability SNR” is too conservative: a model may fail the criterion at a given SNR, but not necessarily incur a biased measurement of any individual parameters. This problem can be solved by taking into account errors orthogonal to the model space (which, therefore, do not induce a bias), and calculating indistinguishability SNRs for individual parameters, rather than the full <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mi>N</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math>-dimensional parameter space. We illustrate this approach with the simple example of aligned-spin binary black hole signals, and calculate accurate estimates of the SNR at which each parameter measurement will be biased. In general, biases occur at much higher SNRs than predicted from the standard mismatch calculation. Which parameters are most easily biased depends sensitively on the details of a given waveform model, and the location in parameter space, and in some cases the bias SNR is as high as the conservative estimate. We also illustrate how the parameter bias SNR can be used to robustly specify waveform accuracy requirements for future detectors.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(6)
California Institute of Technology (US), University of Southampton (GB), University of Portsmouth (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, UK Research and Innovation, Cardiff University, Science and Technology Facilities Council, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.