Information support for public procurement and its institutional content

The subject of the study is the relationship between the informational support of public procurement and its effectiveness, including the context of minimizing appeals (in administrative and judicial procedures). The author emphasizes the electronization and digitalization of public procurement in the context of the stated research topic. In the author's understanding, electronization is a form, while digitalization is an algorithm for carrying out procurement (in a broad sense: not only as a procedure, but as a legal relationship, including contractual obligations). The author examines and evaluates the role of operators of electronic trading platforms in public procurement, noting that, while not being direct subjects of contracting, they influence the results of the contract itself. The article analyzes Eurasian cooperation in terms of informational collaboration, highlighting the critical component of mutual recognition of electronic digital signatures. The methodology of the work is presented through general scientific research methods, such as analysis and synthesis, deduction, dialectics, systematic and comparative methods, as well as specific methods, in particular, formal legal analysis. The novelty of the research presented in the article lies in the institutional approach to assessing the informational support of public procurement (for state and municipal needs); the author has identified causal relationships between information and the effectiveness of procurement. Furthermore, the author proposes for the first time an understanding of the institutional content of procurement information in its relationship with the administrative control of public procurement. Judicial control is not analyzed in the article as it is a separate subject of research due to its procedural specificity. The author also concludes that the activities of electronic trading platform operators influence the effectiveness of procurements: while not being direct participants in the contractual relationships between the customer and the supplier, they determine the contractual obligations that arise subsequently. The author forecasts the necessity of mutual recognition of electronic digital signatures at the level of the EAEU, without which the formation of a common market for public procurement in the Eurasian space will be impossible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Юридические исследования
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2025.9.75576
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information support for public procurement and its institutional content

Natalia A. Nazarova
Юридические исследования
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Information support for public procurement and its institutional content

Natalia A. Nazarova
article en

Abstract

The subject of the study is the relationship between the informational support of public procurement and its effectiveness, including the context of minimizing appeals (in administrative and judicial procedures). The author emphasizes the electronization and digitalization of public procurement in the context of the stated research topic. In the author's understanding, electronization is a form, while digitalization is an algorithm for carrying out procurement (in a broad sense: not only as a procedure, but as a legal relationship, including contractual obligations). The author examines and evaluates the role of operators of electronic trading platforms in public procurement, noting that, while not being direct subjects of contracting, they influence the results of the contract itself. The article analyzes Eurasian cooperation in terms of informational collaboration, highlighting the critical component of mutual recognition of electronic digital signatures. The methodology of the work is presented through general scientific research methods, such as analysis and synthesis, deduction, dialectics, systematic and comparative methods, as well as specific methods, in particular, formal legal analysis. The novelty of the research presented in the article lies in the institutional approach to assessing the informational support of public procurement (for state and municipal needs); the author has identified causal relationships between information and the effectiveness of procurement. Furthermore, the author proposes for the first time an understanding of the institutional content of procurement information in its relationship with the administrative control of public procurement. Judicial control is not analyzed in the article as it is a separate subject of research due to its procedural specificity. The author also concludes that the activities of electronic trading platform operators influence the effectiveness of procurements: while not being direct participants in the contractual relationships between the customer and the supplier, they determine the contractual obligations that arise subsequently. The author forecasts the necessity of mutual recognition of electronic digital signatures at the level of the EAEU, without which the formation of a common market for public procurement in the Eurasian space will be impossible.

Юридические исследования(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.