Studi Komparatif Pelaksanaan Hak Restitusi Bagi Korban Perdagangan Orang di Indonesia

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the law on the fulfillment of the right of restitution Against Trafficking in Persons in Indonesia. This study uses normative legal methods. The results of this study are (1) the fulfillment of the right of restitution to victims of trafficking in Persons is regulated in Law regulated in Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the eradication of human trafficking, the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in Compensation for Losses resulting from criminal acts, Law No. 31 of 2014 amendments to Law no. 13 of 2006 concerning the protection of witnesses and victims. (2) the effectiveness of the fulfillment of the right to restitution of victims of trafficking in Persons has not been effective because because criminal justice has not provided certainty regarding the fulfillment of restitution, and the absence of consistency in the handing down of decisions regarding the rights of restitution for TIP victims in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Varied Knowledge Journal
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71094/vkj.v2i1.55
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studi Komparatif Pelaksanaan Hak Restitusi Bagi Korban Perdagangan Orang di Indonesia

Ursula Andriani Bui
Varied Knowledge Journal
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Studi Komparatif Pelaksanaan Hak Restitusi Bagi Korban Perdagangan Orang di Indonesia

Ursula Andriani Bui
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the law on the fulfillment of the right of restitution Against Trafficking in Persons in Indonesia. This study uses normative legal methods. The results of this study are (1) the fulfillment of the right of restitution to victims of trafficking in Persons is regulated in Law regulated in Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the eradication of human trafficking, the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in Compensation for Losses resulting from criminal acts, Law No. 31 of 2014 amendments to Law no. 13 of 2006 concerning the protection of witnesses and victims. (2) the effectiveness of the fulfillment of the right to restitution of victims of trafficking in Persons has not been effective because because criminal justice has not provided certainty regarding the fulfillment of restitution, and the absence of consistency in the handing down of decisions regarding the rights of restitution for TIP victims in Indonesia.

Varied Knowledge JournalVol. 2(1)
Universitas Saburai (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.