Dating Apps: A “Logistics of Desire”

Dating apps are fundamentally reshaping romantic and sexual dynamics by leveraging powerful algorithms to optimize human interactions. While the digital platforms democratize access to connections—benefiting marginalized groups like LGBTQIA+ individuals and those in rural areas—they also introduce a significant logistical burden, often referred to as the “logistics of desire.” Women navigate environments fraught with safety concerns and heightened emotional expectations, while men contend with pressures to conform to traditional expressions of masculinity. A transactional perspective dominates online dating, reducing human relationships to utilitarian processes. Nonetheless, many users actively seek to infuse authenticity into their interactions, resisting the consumer-driven logic inherent in the digital platforms. For dating apps to evolve meaningfully, they must embrace values like empathy and active listening while recalibrating their algorithms to prioritize emotionally fulfilling and enduring relationships. The challenge lies in harmonizing the logistical efficiency of digital matchmaking with the depth and authenticity that define meaningful human connections.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15640/jsspi.v13p1
Primary Topic
Sharing Economy and Platforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dating Apps: A “Logistics of Desire”

Gilles Paché
Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications
Sharing Economy and Platforms
article

Dating Apps: A “Logistics of Desire”

Gilles Paché
article en

Abstract

Dating apps are fundamentally reshaping romantic and sexual dynamics by leveraging powerful algorithms to optimize human interactions. While the digital platforms democratize access to connections—benefiting marginalized groups like LGBTQIA+ individuals and those in rural areas—they also introduce a significant logistical burden, often referred to as the “logistics of desire.” Women navigate environments fraught with safety concerns and heightened emotional expectations, while men contend with pressures to conform to traditional expressions of masculinity. A transactional perspective dominates online dating, reducing human relationships to utilitarian processes. Nonetheless, many users actively seek to infuse authenticity into their interactions, resisting the consumer-driven logic inherent in the digital platforms. For dating apps to evolve meaningfully, they must embrace values like empathy and active listening while recalibrating their algorithms to prioritize emotionally fulfilling and enduring relationships. The challenge lies in harmonizing the logistical efficiency of digital matchmaking with the depth and authenticity that define meaningful human connections.

Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sharing Economy and Platforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.