Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Science

Abstract Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has rapidly emerged as a tool in scientific research. To examine its diffusion and impact relative to other AI technologies, we conduct an empirical analysis using the OpenAlex bibliometric database to retrieve GenAI and other AI relevant publications. To distinguish between publications that adopt AI technologies and those that mention them without AI use, we develop a two-stage classifier based on GPT-4 and SciBERT to categorize AI publications by their focus on either application or discussion. For publications from 2017 to 2023, we analyze growth trends and the geographical distribution of GenAI adoption across scientific fields. We also examine changes in team size and international collaboration to assess whether GenAI, as an emerging research area, exhibits distinct collaboration patterns compared to other AI technologies. Our findings show a rapid growth not only in GenAI-related publications but also in their applications, which are expanding beyond computer science into a wide range of disciplines. U.S. researchers produced nearly two-fifths of global GenAI publications and applications, while Chinese researchers contributed almost one-third. Several small and medium-sized advanced economies also demonstrate relatively high levels of GenAI applications in research. GenAI application is positively associated with larger team sizes ( p < 0.001) and higher rates of international collaboration ( p < 0.05). In GenAI discussion publications, the positive correlation with international collaboration is also significant ( p < 0.05). This suggests that applying GenAI in scientific research may require greater collaborative efforts, especially international partnerships, potentially reinforcing global collaboration networks embedded in the geography of knowledge production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientometrics
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05413-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Science

Liangping Ding, Cornelia Lawson, Philip Shapira
4 citations
Scientometrics
Scientific Computing and Data Management
16.68
article

Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Science

Liangping Ding, Cornelia Lawson, Philip Shapira
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has rapidly emerged as a tool in scientific research. To examine its diffusion and impact relative to other AI technologies, we conduct an empirical analysis using the OpenAlex bibliometric database to retrieve GenAI and other AI relevant publications. To distinguish between publications that adopt AI technologies and those that mention them without AI use, we develop a two-stage classifier based on GPT-4 and SciBERT to categorize AI publications by their focus on either application or discussion. For publications from 2017 to 2023, we analyze growth trends and the geographical distribution of GenAI adoption across scientific fields. We also examine changes in team size and international collaboration to assess whether GenAI, as an emerging research area, exhibits distinct collaboration patterns compared to other AI technologies. Our findings show a rapid growth not only in GenAI-related publications but also in their applications, which are expanding beyond computer science into a wide range of disciplines. U.S. researchers produced nearly two-fifths of global GenAI publications and applications, while Chinese researchers contributed almost one-third. Several small and medium-sized advanced economies also demonstrate relatively high levels of GenAI applications in research. GenAI application is positively associated with larger team sizes ( p < 0.001) and higher rates of international collaboration ( p < 0.05). In GenAI discussion publications, the positive correlation with international collaboration is also significant ( p < 0.05). This suggests that applying GenAI in scientific research may require greater collaborative efforts, especially international partnerships, potentially reinforcing global collaboration networks embedded in the geography of knowledge production.

ScientometricsVol. 130(9)
Carter Center (US), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
16.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Science — Liangping Ding, Cornelia Lawson, et al. · Scientometrics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS