Acid Test: The AD-X2 Affair and the Political Awakening of American Science

Abstract: In March 1953, Allen Astin, director of the National Bureau of Standards, lost his job. He was fired by Sinclair Weeks, President Dwight D. Eisenhower's newly confirmed secretary of commerce. The bureau had concluded that AD-X2, an aftermarket additive advertised as extending the life of automotive batteries, was ineffective. Weeks regarded the condemnation as an attack on small business and sought to install friendlier leadership at the bureau. American scientists were outraged. A frenetic mobilization quickly organized censures by dozens of scientific organizations and forced Weeks to back down; Astin would lead the bureau until his retirement in 1969. Attention to this episode clarifies how the American scientific community translated the attention that nuclear weapons brought into concrete political influence—not through leveraging the power of the bomb, but by brandishing their apolitical credentials to exert control over key institutions and by emphasizing the centrality of routine scientific practice to national priorities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Quarterly
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2025.a969196
Primary Topic
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acid Test: The AD-X2 Affair and the Political Awakening of American Science

Joseph D. Martin
American Quarterly
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
article

Acid Test: The AD-X2 Affair and the Political Awakening of American Science

Joseph D. Martin
article en

Abstract

Abstract: In March 1953, Allen Astin, director of the National Bureau of Standards, lost his job. He was fired by Sinclair Weeks, President Dwight D. Eisenhower's newly confirmed secretary of commerce. The bureau had concluded that AD-X2, an aftermarket additive advertised as extending the life of automotive batteries, was ineffective. Weeks regarded the condemnation as an attack on small business and sought to install friendlier leadership at the bureau. American scientists were outraged. A frenetic mobilization quickly organized censures by dozens of scientific organizations and forced Weeks to back down; Astin would lead the bureau until his retirement in 1969. Attention to this episode clarifies how the American scientific community translated the attention that nuclear weapons brought into concrete political influence—not through leveraging the power of the bomb, but by brandishing their apolitical credentials to exert control over key institutions and by emphasizing the centrality of routine scientific practice to national priorities.

American QuarterlyVol. 77(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.