Sampling Regime Effects on Detecting Spatial Stability of Water Quality

Abstract Protecting surface water quality can be complicated by high spatiotemporal variability. Pollutant sources and transport pathways may be identified through sufficiently high‐density monitoring sites and high‐frequency sampling, but practical considerations necessitate tradeoffs between spatial and temporal resolution in water quality monitoring network design. We examined how tradeoffs in sampling density and frequency affect measures of spatiotemporal variability in water quality, emphasizing pattern stability over time. We quantified the spatial stability of stream water quality across >250 monitoring sites in the intensively monitored watershed draining to Lake Okeechobee, FL using Spearman's rank correlations between instantaneous observations and site long‐term means for each parameter. We found that water quality spatial patterns for geogenic, biogenic, and anthropogenic parameters were generally stable on decadal timescales for all solutes, and that sampling densely in space yields more information than sampling frequently in time. Variations in spatial stability decreased with increased sampling density but not with greater sampling frequency, attesting to the dominance of spatial variability over temporal variability. For nutrients, the spatial coefficient of variation (CV) was approximately double the temporal CV. Spatial stability of most solutes was similar across flow conditions, but high‐flow monitoring allows for more sites that effectively capture the long‐term spatial patterns of nutrient sources. Water quality monitoring regimes can be optimized for efficiency in capturing water quality patterns and should be adjusted to focus more on spatial variation. We discuss potential improvements for water quality monitoring, particularly in watersheds where scarce resources necessitate tradeoffs between sampling density and frequency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr038844
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sampling Regime Effects on Detecting Spatial Stability of Water Quality

Matthew J. Cohen, Dan Dai, James W. Jawitz, Nicolas Fernandez
1 citations
Water Resources Research
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
0.82
article

Sampling Regime Effects on Detecting Spatial Stability of Water Quality

Matthew J. Cohen, Dan Dai, James W. Jawitz, Nicolas Fernandez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Protecting surface water quality can be complicated by high spatiotemporal variability. Pollutant sources and transport pathways may be identified through sufficiently high‐density monitoring sites and high‐frequency sampling, but practical considerations necessitate tradeoffs between spatial and temporal resolution in water quality monitoring network design. We examined how tradeoffs in sampling density and frequency affect measures of spatiotemporal variability in water quality, emphasizing pattern stability over time. We quantified the spatial stability of stream water quality across >250 monitoring sites in the intensively monitored watershed draining to Lake Okeechobee, FL using Spearman's rank correlations between instantaneous observations and site long‐term means for each parameter. We found that water quality spatial patterns for geogenic, biogenic, and anthropogenic parameters were generally stable on decadal timescales for all solutes, and that sampling densely in space yields more information than sampling frequently in time. Variations in spatial stability decreased with increased sampling density but not with greater sampling frequency, attesting to the dominance of spatial variability over temporal variability. For nutrients, the spatial coefficient of variation (CV) was approximately double the temporal CV. Spatial stability of most solutes was similar across flow conditions, but high‐flow monitoring allows for more sites that effectively capture the long‐term spatial patterns of nutrient sources. Water quality monitoring regimes can be optimized for efficiency in capturing water quality patterns and should be adjusted to focus more on spatial variation. We discuss potential improvements for water quality monitoring, particularly in watersheds where scarce resources necessitate tradeoffs between sampling density and frequency.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(9)
University of Florida (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.