Assessment of soil pH and lime requirement methods and recommended lime rates for six reference soils across US land grant institutions

Abstract Soil pH and liming recommendations that address the soils, crops, and liming materials have been developed and adopted by land grant universities since the early 20th century. We inventoried land grant institution soil pH and lime requirement (LR) measurement methods for 1980 and 2020 and examined differences in lime rate recommendations for six reference soils using a survey developed by members of the Fertilizer Recommendation Support Tool initiative. Laboratory analysis for six acidic soils with a range of properties was shared with scientists requesting a lime recommendation for each, assuming a 0‐ to 15‐cm soil depth, 6.5 target pH, and lime material having 100% effective calcium carbonate equivalence. Soil pH methods, LR methods, and lime rate recommendations were documented for 48, 41, and 34 states, respectively. The most widely used pH method was a 1:1 soil–water ratio (34 states, 71%). Thirty‐one states use one or more buffer solutions to determine LR with the most widely used being the Sikora (10 states), Mehlich (10 states), and Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (nine states) buffers. Forty lime rate recommendations from 34 states for each soil were summarized with median rates ranging from 2242 to 9079 kg ha −1 and coefficients of variation ranging from 41% to 73%. The reasons for high LR variability are likely due to different calibrations as no strong trends for LR method or region were observed. Efforts are needed to develop and harmonize lime recommendations to provide accurate and transparent guidance, especially for states sharing common soils and boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70116
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of soil pH and lime requirement methods and recommended lime rates for six reference soils across US land grant institutions

John Jones, F. J. Sikora, Nathan A. Slaton, John T. Spargo et al.
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Assessment of soil pH and lime requirement methods and recommended lime rates for six reference soils across US land grant institutions

John Jones, F. J. Sikora, Nathan A. Slaton, John T. Spargo, Deanna L. Osmond, Manbir K. Rakkar, Robert O. Miller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Soil pH and liming recommendations that address the soils, crops, and liming materials have been developed and adopted by land grant universities since the early 20th century. We inventoried land grant institution soil pH and lime requirement (LR) measurement methods for 1980 and 2020 and examined differences in lime rate recommendations for six reference soils using a survey developed by members of the Fertilizer Recommendation Support Tool initiative. Laboratory analysis for six acidic soils with a range of properties was shared with scientists requesting a lime recommendation for each, assuming a 0‐ to 15‐cm soil depth, 6.5 target pH, and lime material having 100% effective calcium carbonate equivalence. Soil pH methods, LR methods, and lime rate recommendations were documented for 48, 41, and 34 states, respectively. The most widely used pH method was a 1:1 soil–water ratio (34 states, 71%). Thirty‐one states use one or more buffer solutions to determine LR with the most widely used being the Sikora (10 states), Mehlich (10 states), and Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (nine states) buffers. Forty lime rate recommendations from 34 states for each soil were summarized with median rates ranging from 2242 to 9079 kg ha −1 and coefficients of variation ranging from 41% to 73%. The reasons for high LR variability are likely due to different calibrations as no strong trends for LR method or region were observed. Efforts are needed to develop and harmonize lime recommendations to provide accurate and transparent guidance, especially for states sharing common soils and boundaries.

Soil Science Society of America JournalVol. 89(5)
Pennsylvania State University (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Kentucky (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Arkansas System (US), Analytical Services (US), Windsor Dermatology (US), The Ohio State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.