Transforming Excellence?

‘Excellence’ is omnipresent in the research ecosystem but the focus on excellence is increasingly controversial. This paper contributes to the excellence debate through an empirical study of how notions of excellence are used in eight research funding organizations. Because research funding organizations are shaped by the excellence regime, and constrained by both governmental policy and scientific elites, funders cannot simply resort to a debunking critique and do away with excellence altogether. To navigate the ambiguous relationship to excellence, the approach to excellence is shifting from it being taken as a ‘matter of fact’ to a ‘matter of concern’ that needs to be unpacked and reconfigured. In mitigation strategies funders attempt to reconfigure excellence by patching, pluralizing and transforming their activities around excellence. We argue that a transformation of the research ecosystem is unlikely to happen when underlying assumptions about competition and meritocratic ideals are not also problematized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Technology Studies
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.149512
Primary Topic
Organizational Learning and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transforming Excellence?

Stephen Pinfield, Lisette Jong, Thomas Franssen
Science & Technology Studies
Organizational Learning and Leadership
article

Transforming Excellence?

Stephen Pinfield, Lisette Jong, Thomas Franssen
article en

Abstract

‘Excellence’ is omnipresent in the research ecosystem but the focus on excellence is increasingly controversial. This paper contributes to the excellence debate through an empirical study of how notions of excellence are used in eight research funding organizations. Because research funding organizations are shaped by the excellence regime, and constrained by both governmental policy and scientific elites, funders cannot simply resort to a debunking critique and do away with excellence altogether. To navigate the ambiguous relationship to excellence, the approach to excellence is shifting from it being taken as a ‘matter of fact’ to a ‘matter of concern’ that needs to be unpacked and reconfigured. In mitigation strategies funders attempt to reconfigure excellence by patching, pluralizing and transforming their activities around excellence. We argue that a transformation of the research ecosystem is unlikely to happen when underlying assumptions about competition and meritocratic ideals are not also problematized.

Science & Technology Studies
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
National Science Foundation, Wellcome Trust, Michael Smith Health Research BC, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Fondazione Telethon, Austrian Science Fund, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Organizational Learning and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transforming Excellence? — Stephen Pinfield, Lisette Jong, et al. · Science & Technology Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS