Co-Benefits and Synergies between Food Security and Eight Positive Peace Pillars

Nowadays, food insecurity (FI) remains one of the most challenging issues due to the complexity of food systems and its structural and underlying causes including governance, economic and production issues, demographical and social issues, and climate/environment, aligning with the four dimensions of sustainable development (economic, social, environmental, and institutional). Regarding to this, when constructing any potential solutions, it is important to identify the fundamental needs, key actors, and major priorities. In speaking of peace, impacts of conflicts (CF) are major drivers of food insecurity, including agricultural damage, food system & production disruptions, crops and livestock plundering, and assets and income loss. Conversely, food insecurity can undermine peace and trigger conflicts with various factors fueled by rapid increase in food prices, limited accesses to food, food supply chain disruption, etc. To understand this nexus better, this study conducts a systematic bibliometric analysis of the literature on food security and the eight pillars of Positive Peace. We searched the Web of Science database, applying stringent inclusion criteria focused on articles detailing interactions between specific food security dimensions (availability, accessibility, utilizaiton, stability) and the eight pillars of Positive Peace (functional government, equitable resources, free information flow, neighborly relations, human capital, rights acceptance, low corruption, sound business environment.). From an initial pool of 123 records, 27 articles met the criteria for full analysis. Findings highlight strongest interactions: (1) Availability-Positive Peace/Conflict (e.g., GM crops); (2) Accessibility-Equitable Distribution of Resources (water/land access) & Food Accessibility/Food Insecurity-Positive Peace/Conflict (e.g., COVID lockdowns); (3) Availability-Governance/Equitable Distribution of Resources (e.g., food aid) & Food Insecurity-Governance (e.g., effective institutions). This analysis provides evidence-based pathways for designing integrated solutions that simultaneously strengthen food security and foster durable peace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban and Building Science
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/ubs.2025.100006
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Benefits and Synergies between Food Security and Eight Positive Peace Pillars

Ali Cheshmehzangi, Tong Zou
Urban and Building Science
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Co-Benefits and Synergies between Food Security and Eight Positive Peace Pillars

Ali Cheshmehzangi, Tong Zou
article en

Abstract

Nowadays, food insecurity (FI) remains one of the most challenging issues due to the complexity of food systems and its structural and underlying causes including governance, economic and production issues, demographical and social issues, and climate/environment, aligning with the four dimensions of sustainable development (economic, social, environmental, and institutional). Regarding to this, when constructing any potential solutions, it is important to identify the fundamental needs, key actors, and major priorities. In speaking of peace, impacts of conflicts (CF) are major drivers of food insecurity, including agricultural damage, food system & production disruptions, crops and livestock plundering, and assets and income loss. Conversely, food insecurity can undermine peace and trigger conflicts with various factors fueled by rapid increase in food prices, limited accesses to food, food supply chain disruption, etc. To understand this nexus better, this study conducts a systematic bibliometric analysis of the literature on food security and the eight pillars of Positive Peace. We searched the Web of Science database, applying stringent inclusion criteria focused on articles detailing interactions between specific food security dimensions (availability, accessibility, utilizaiton, stability) and the eight pillars of Positive Peace (functional government, equitable resources, free information flow, neighborly relations, human capital, rights acceptance, low corruption, sound business environment.). From an initial pool of 123 records, 27 articles met the criteria for full analysis. Findings highlight strongest interactions: (1) Availability-Positive Peace/Conflict (e.g., GM crops); (2) Accessibility-Equitable Distribution of Resources (water/land access) & Food Accessibility/Food Insecurity-Positive Peace/Conflict (e.g., COVID lockdowns); (3) Availability-Governance/Equitable Distribution of Resources (e.g., food aid) & Food Insecurity-Governance (e.g., effective institutions). This analysis provides evidence-based pathways for designing integrated solutions that simultaneously strengthen food security and foster durable peace.

Urban and Building ScienceVol. 1(1)
Guangdong University of Technology (CN), The University of Queensland (AU), Changsha University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.