Typology of Subjectivity on Fundamental Sports Rights and Priority Values of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities

This study aims to categorize the types of subjectivity regarding the fundamental sports rights and priority values as perceived by individuals with developmental disabilities. Q methodology was adopted as the analytical framework. A P sample of 25 adult males with developmental disabilities, all of whom participated in unified football programs, was selected. The Q-sorting process was conducted with the assistance of partner players (non-disabled individuals) and guardians. The results of the Q-factor analysis revealed three distinct types of priority values attributed to fundamental sports rights: ‘Type I: Emphasis on Facilities and Infrastructure’; ‘Type II: Emphasis on Administrative and Legal Systems’; and ‘Type III: Emphasis on Safety and Accessibility’. In conclusion, the study highlights the need for macro-level support such as the expansion of facilities and infrastructure and the reinforcement of legal and institutional foundations. At the individual level, it underscores the importance of ensuring safety, convenience, and transportation rights to guarantee the fundamental sports rights of persons with developmental disabilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Society for Leisure Sciences
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37408/kjls.2025.16.3.121
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Typology of Subjectivity on Fundamental Sports Rights and Priority Values of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities

Wangsung Myung, Soo Kyum Kim
Korean Society for Leisure Sciences
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
article

Typology of Subjectivity on Fundamental Sports Rights and Priority Values of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities

Wangsung Myung, Soo Kyum Kim
article en

Abstract

This study aims to categorize the types of subjectivity regarding the fundamental sports rights and priority values as perceived by individuals with developmental disabilities. Q methodology was adopted as the analytical framework. A P sample of 25 adult males with developmental disabilities, all of whom participated in unified football programs, was selected. The Q-sorting process was conducted with the assistance of partner players (non-disabled individuals) and guardians. The results of the Q-factor analysis revealed three distinct types of priority values attributed to fundamental sports rights: ‘Type I: Emphasis on Facilities and Infrastructure’; ‘Type II: Emphasis on Administrative and Legal Systems’; and ‘Type III: Emphasis on Safety and Accessibility’. In conclusion, the study highlights the need for macro-level support such as the expansion of facilities and infrastructure and the reinforcement of legal and institutional foundations. At the individual level, it underscores the importance of ensuring safety, convenience, and transportation rights to guarantee the fundamental sports rights of persons with developmental disabilities.

Korean Society for Leisure SciencesVol. 16(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.