Impact of curiosity-based reading on summary writing in Sri Lankan ESL universities

This study examined Sri Lankan English as a Second Language (ESL) undergraduate learners’ reading-to-write task performance over six weeks. The Experimental Group (EG; n = 33) read and summarized articles rated as curious on a Likert scale measuring curiosity, while the Control Group (CG; n = 31) read articles rated as incurious (low-curiosity end of the scale). A pre-test and post-test were used to assess participants’ summary writing performance across five rubric dimensions. A combined measure of all dimensions showed that both groups improved significantly; however, the difference in gain scores between the EG and CG was not statistically significant, despite a small to medium effect size favouring the treatment group. However, an analysis of the individual dimensions revealed that the EG significantly outperformed the CG in the Overall Quality dimension, with a medium-to-large effect size. Results speak to the potential of curiosity in ESL instruction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Reading in a Foreign Language
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/67514
Primary Topic
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of curiosity-based reading on summary writing in Sri Lankan ESL universities

Ruwan Gunawardane, Joshua Matthews
Reading in a Foreign Language
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
article

Impact of curiosity-based reading on summary writing in Sri Lankan ESL universities

Ruwan Gunawardane, Joshua Matthews
article en

Abstract

This study examined Sri Lankan English as a Second Language (ESL) undergraduate learners’ reading-to-write task performance over six weeks. The Experimental Group (EG; n = 33) read and summarized articles rated as curious on a Likert scale measuring curiosity, while the Control Group (CG; n = 31) read articles rated as incurious (low-curiosity end of the scale). A pre-test and post-test were used to assess participants’ summary writing performance across five rubric dimensions. A combined measure of all dimensions showed that both groups improved significantly; however, the difference in gain scores between the EG and CG was not statistically significant, despite a small to medium effect size favouring the treatment group. However, an analysis of the individual dimensions revealed that the EG significantly outperformed the CG in the Overall Quality dimension, with a medium-to-large effect size. Results speak to the potential of curiosity in ESL instruction.

Reading in a Foreign LanguageVol. 37(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.