Female biased offspring sex ratios of eastern wild turkeys across the southeastern United States

Prevailing theory suggests that sex ratios of offspring at birth should not differ from parity if costs of producing offspring of both sexes are similar. However, offspring sex ratios may deviate from parity when there is sex specific variation in fitness returns. We assessed offspring sex ratios of eastern wild turkeys ( Meleagris gallopavo silvestris ) across the southeastern United States by molecular determination of sex from eggshell membranes of hatched clutches. Our objective was to evaluate whether offspring sex ratios differed from parity and to examine potential drivers of variation in offspring sex ratios across and within our study sites. We sexed 724 offspring from 83 nests using molecular markers and identified 278 males and 446 females, with a sex ratio of 38% male. We found that offspring sex ratios were biased towards females on three hunted study sites but did not differ from parity at our remaining non‐hunted site. Specifically, on sites with spring hunting, where male mortality was increased due to harvest, the probability of producing male offspring was 47% lower than on our non‐hunted site. Our findings suggest that female wild turkeys may adaptively adjust the sex ratio of their offspring based on predictable, sex specific mortality, favoring the sex with higher survival, thereby enhancing their lifetime fitness. Our results provide insights into reproductive strategies of wild turkeys and the influence of hunting on sex ratios in Galliform offspring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Avian Biology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jav.03515
Primary Topic
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Female biased offspring sex ratios of eastern wild turkeys across the southeastern United States

Nicholas W. Bakner, Chad M. Argabright, Michael J. Chamberlain, Helen M. Bothwell et al.
Journal of Avian Biology
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
article

Female biased offspring sex ratios of eastern wild turkeys across the southeastern United States

Nicholas W. Bakner, Chad M. Argabright, Michael J. Chamberlain, Helen M. Bothwell, Philip Lavretsky, Erin E. Ulrey, Steven G. Watkins, Bret A. Collier, John C. Kilgo, Patrick H. Wightman, Paige E. Goodman
article en

Abstract

Prevailing theory suggests that sex ratios of offspring at birth should not differ from parity if costs of producing offspring of both sexes are similar. However, offspring sex ratios may deviate from parity when there is sex specific variation in fitness returns. We assessed offspring sex ratios of eastern wild turkeys ( Meleagris gallopavo silvestris ) across the southeastern United States by molecular determination of sex from eggshell membranes of hatched clutches. Our objective was to evaluate whether offspring sex ratios differed from parity and to examine potential drivers of variation in offspring sex ratios across and within our study sites. We sexed 724 offspring from 83 nests using molecular markers and identified 278 males and 446 females, with a sex ratio of 38% male. We found that offspring sex ratios were biased towards females on three hunted study sites but did not differ from parity at our remaining non‐hunted site. Specifically, on sites with spring hunting, where male mortality was increased due to harvest, the probability of producing male offspring was 47% lower than on our non‐hunted site. Our findings suggest that female wild turkeys may adaptively adjust the sex ratio of their offspring based on predictable, sex specific mortality, favoring the sex with higher survival, thereby enhancing their lifetime fitness. Our results provide insights into reproductive strategies of wild turkeys and the influence of hunting on sex ratios in Galliform offspring.

Journal of Avian BiologyVol. 2025(5)
United States Department of Agriculture (US), Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), University of Georgia (US), Southern Research Station (US), Tennessee Technological University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Missouri, University of Georgia, Louisiana State University, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.