Evaluation of a markerless motion capture system for measuring mechanical work during tennis strokes

This study evaluated the agreement between markerless motion capture and criterion methods for estimating mechanical work (external and internal) performed during tennis strokes. Sixteen tennis players performed 10 serve, forehand and backhand movements whilst motion data were captured concurrently with a custom 3D markerless system (utilising open-source pose estimation; HRNet and OpenPose) and two criterion methods: marker-based motion capture and ground reaction forces. Centre of mass kinetic and potential energy were calculated and used to compute external mechanical work from all methods, whilst segment kinetic energies were calculated and used to compute internal mechanical work from the kinematic approaches only. Small biases (≤4%) and moderate limits of agreement (LoA; ±6-10%) from Bland-Altman analyses indicated strong agreement with the criterion systems for external work across multiple strokes. Although small biases of 4-7% (HRNet) and 1-2% (OpenPose) were observed for internal work, high-frequency artefacts in markerless kinematics (particularly evident for OpenPose) led to high random errors (LoA of ± 8-13% [HRNet] and ± 12-21% [OpenPose]) and large inter-individual differences. Our markerless approach shows promise for measuring external mechanical work during tennis and has the potential to be implemented in the field as a non-invasive tool for on-court workload monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2555096
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a markerless motion capture system for measuring mechanical work during tennis strokes

Sean Williams, Laurie Needham, Steffi Colyer, Julie Emmerson
1 citations
Journal of Sports Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Evaluation of a markerless motion capture system for measuring mechanical work during tennis strokes

Sean Williams, Laurie Needham, Steffi Colyer, Julie Emmerson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the agreement between markerless motion capture and criterion methods for estimating mechanical work (external and internal) performed during tennis strokes. Sixteen tennis players performed 10 serve, forehand and backhand movements whilst motion data were captured concurrently with a custom 3D markerless system (utilising open-source pose estimation; HRNet and OpenPose) and two criterion methods: marker-based motion capture and ground reaction forces. Centre of mass kinetic and potential energy were calculated and used to compute external mechanical work from all methods, whilst segment kinetic energies were calculated and used to compute internal mechanical work from the kinematic approaches only. Small biases (≤4%) and moderate limits of agreement (LoA; ±6-10%) from Bland-Altman analyses indicated strong agreement with the criterion systems for external work across multiple strokes. Although small biases of 4-7% (HRNet) and 1-2% (OpenPose) were observed for internal work, high-frequency artefacts in markerless kinematics (particularly evident for OpenPose) led to high random errors (LoA of ± 8-13% [HRNet] and ± 12-21% [OpenPose]) and large inter-individual differences. Our markerless approach shows promise for measuring external mechanical work during tennis and has the potential to be implemented in the field as a non-invasive tool for on-court workload monitoring.

Journal of Sports Sciences
Seiko Holdings (Japan) (JP), University of Bath (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.