Preparation and comparison of the performance of (CuO) nanostructures and (CuO)/(CdS) composites as anode electrodes in DSSCs using the natural dye of chard

In this research, copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles and copper oxide/cadmium sulfate (CuO/CdS) nanocomposite were prepared and used to construct dye-sensitized DSSCs, which were used as photoelectrodes using a natural dye prepared from chard as an adsorption medium (green dye) due to its low cost and availability in nature. The study indicated that the green dye performs better in DSSCs with CuO nanoparticles than in those with CuO/CdS nanocomposites, based on efficiency measurements using the Keithley apparatus. The power conversion efficiency (η) of CuO was 0.175%, while that of CdS was 0.141%. The current measured for both cells was 108.7 mA for CuO and 28.7 mA for CuO/CdS

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v8i3.5713
Primary Topic
Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparation and comparison of the performance of (CuO) nanostructures and (CuO)/(CdS) composites as anode electrodes in DSSCs using the natural dye of chard

Nadia Badr, Amer Muosa Juda Al-Shamari
1 links
Applied Chemical Engineering
Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
article

Preparation and comparison of the performance of (CuO) nanostructures and (CuO)/(CdS) composites as anode electrodes in DSSCs using the natural dye of chard

Nadia Badr, Amer Muosa Juda Al-Shamari
article en

Abstract

In this research, copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles and copper oxide/cadmium sulfate (CuO/CdS) nanocomposite were prepared and used to construct dye-sensitized DSSCs, which were used as photoelectrodes using a natural dye prepared from chard as an adsorption medium (green dye) due to its low cost and availability in nature. The study indicated that the green dye performs better in DSSCs with CuO nanoparticles than in those with CuO/CdS nanocomposites, based on efficiency measurements using the Keithley apparatus. The power conversion efficiency (η) of CuO was 0.175%, while that of CdS was 0.141%. The current measured for both cells was 108.7 mA for CuO and 28.7 mA for CuO/CdS

Applied Chemical Engineering
University of Kufa (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.