Off‐Label Antipsychotic Withdrawal in People With Intellectual Disabilities: Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model

The odds of unsuccessful withdrawal increase with a more severe level of intellectual disability, a higher antipsychotic defined daily dose and higher stereotypy scores. The results inform healthcare providers about the predictive factors enabling them to better anticipate and support future withdrawal attempts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70038
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Off‐Label Antipsychotic Withdrawal in People With Intellectual Disabilities: Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model

Roy G. Elbers, Maureen B. G. Wissing, Dederieke A. M. Festen, Gerda de Kuijper et al.
1 citations
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
1.88
article

Off‐Label Antipsychotic Withdrawal in People With Intellectual Disabilities: Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model

Roy G. Elbers, Maureen B. G. Wissing, Dederieke A. M. Festen, Gerda de Kuijper, Josien Jonker, Joëlle Weijgertze‐Lanser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The odds of unsuccessful withdrawal increase with a more severe level of intellectual disability, a higher antipsychotic defined daily dose and higher stereotypy scores. The results inform healthcare providers about the predictive factors enabling them to better anticipate and support future withdrawal attempts.

Journal of Intellectual Disability ResearchVol. 69(10)
Erasmus MC (NL), Department of Health and Aged Care (AU), GGZ Drenthe (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.