Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF): Does RF‐EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response?

In order to understand Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI-EMF), it has been argued that it is crucial to test for effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on biomarkers, given that they can be more objective than symptom reports. While no clear evidence links RF-EMF exposure to biomarker changes, research remains limited and largely speculative due to the lack of known bioeffect mechanisms. However, there is in vitro evidence that cortisol is affected by heating, which, as RF-EMF causes heating, raises the possibility that RF-EMF exposure may increase cortisol via thermally mediated processes. If cortisol is affected by RF-EMF exposure, it may form part of a broader aetiology of IEI-EMF, where RF-EMF-induced physiological (cortisol) inputs first generate somatic sensations, which are then fostered by expectancy or learning-based processes to generate symptoms. However, studies investigating whether RF-EMF exposure influences cortisol have reported inconsistent, but mostly null results, and many suffer from methodological issues. The current study was designed with several methodological improvements to determine whether RF-EMF affects cortisol. Seventy-two participants completed a randomized, double-blind, counterbalanced provocation study where they were exposed to both active (2 W/kg peak SAR<sub>10g</sub> in head) and sham RF-EMF (0 W/kg peak SAR<sub>10g</sub> in head). Despite implementing several methodological improvements, the current study failed to find an effect of RF-EMF exposure on salivary cortisol concentration. This study provides a valuable direction for future research and stresses the importance of establishing and testing theoretically plausible interactions between low-level RF-EMF exposure, the human body, and IEI-EMF symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioelectromagnetics
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF): Does RF‐EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response?

Adam Verrender, Rodney J. Croft, Sarah Loughran, N. Wallace et al.
2 citations
Bioelectromagnetics
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
3.27
article

Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF): Does RF‐EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response?

Adam Verrender, Rodney J. Croft, Sarah Loughran, N. Wallace, Jacob Manley
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In order to understand Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI-EMF), it has been argued that it is crucial to test for effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on biomarkers, given that they can be more objective than symptom reports. While no clear evidence links RF-EMF exposure to biomarker changes, research remains limited and largely speculative due to the lack of known bioeffect mechanisms. However, there is in vitro evidence that cortisol is affected by heating, which, as RF-EMF causes heating, raises the possibility that RF-EMF exposure may increase cortisol via thermally mediated processes. If cortisol is affected by RF-EMF exposure, it may form part of a broader aetiology of IEI-EMF, where RF-EMF-induced physiological (cortisol) inputs first generate somatic sensations, which are then fostered by expectancy or learning-based processes to generate symptoms. However, studies investigating whether RF-EMF exposure influences cortisol have reported inconsistent, but mostly null results, and many suffer from methodological issues. The current study was designed with several methodological improvements to determine whether RF-EMF affects cortisol. Seventy-two participants completed a randomized, double-blind, counterbalanced provocation study where they were exposed to both active (2 W/kg peak SAR<sub>10g</sub> in head) and sham RF-EMF (0 W/kg peak SAR<sub>10g</sub> in head). Despite implementing several methodological improvements, the current study failed to find an effect of RF-EMF exposure on salivary cortisol concentration. This study provides a valuable direction for future research and stresses the importance of establishing and testing theoretically plausible interactions between low-level RF-EMF exposure, the human body, and IEI-EMF symptoms.

BioelectromagneticsVol. 46(6)
University of Wollongong (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science (AU), Environmental Protection Agency (DK), Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.