Concrete Innovation Using Tree Branch Waste as Coarse Aggregate and Stone Ash as Fine Aggregate

Concrete is a widely used construction material. This research investigates the effect of adding tree branch waste and stone dust as substitutes for coarse and fine aggregates on concrete’s physical and mechanical properties. The results show that these additives significantly impact weight and compressive strength. The weight comparison for 10% additive concrete was 7.28 kg at 7 and 14 days, while for 20% additive concrete, it was 7.02 kg at 7 days and 7.06 kg at 14 days. Normal concrete weighed 7.50 kg at 7 days and 7.66 kg at 14 days. The planned compressive strength (K250 or F’c: 20 MPa) for 28 days was met, with samples containing 10% and 20% additives exceeding the planned strength. However, increased use of these materials led to a reduction in compressive strength. Therefore, the addition of tree branches and stone dust should be limited to 10%, as the highest compressive strength was obtained at this percentage. This research suggests that using tree branch waste and stone dust as partial substitutes for aggregates can reduce concrete’s weight while maintaining its strength. Limiting the addition to 10% is recommended for optimal results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025107065
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concrete Innovation Using Tree Branch Waste as Coarse Aggregate and Stone Ash as Fine Aggregate

Utamy Sukmayu Saputri, Irsad Fauzan Sunarlan, Okky Lutfi Fauzi, Usep Saepudin
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
article

Concrete Innovation Using Tree Branch Waste as Coarse Aggregate and Stone Ash as Fine Aggregate

Utamy Sukmayu Saputri, Irsad Fauzan Sunarlan, Okky Lutfi Fauzi, Usep Saepudin
article en

Abstract

Concrete is a widely used construction material. This research investigates the effect of adding tree branch waste and stone dust as substitutes for coarse and fine aggregates on concrete’s physical and mechanical properties. The results show that these additives significantly impact weight and compressive strength. The weight comparison for 10% additive concrete was 7.28 kg at 7 and 14 days, while for 20% additive concrete, it was 7.02 kg at 7 days and 7.06 kg at 14 days. Normal concrete weighed 7.50 kg at 7 days and 7.66 kg at 14 days. The planned compressive strength (K250 or F’c: 20 MPa) for 28 days was met, with samples containing 10% and 20% additives exceeding the planned strength. However, increased use of these materials led to a reduction in compressive strength. Therefore, the addition of tree branches and stone dust should be limited to 10%, as the highest compressive strength was obtained at this percentage. This research suggests that using tree branch waste and stone dust as partial substitutes for aggregates can reduce concrete’s weight while maintaining its strength. Limiting the addition to 10% is recommended for optimal results.

Universitas Wijaya Putra (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.